presumably unpopular with ComEd, since they are suing to not be compelled to purchase power from the plant. So, unpopular with the market for their wares.
something something bad science debunked boondoggle something something.
Frankly the only argument that would really work for me is
“This plant encourages the use of a fuel that is inefficient on a carbon emissions per megawatt basis. even after sequestering technologies are considered,”
Since its a public utility, I rather get the idea that it is the cost per megawatt.
I don;t think it’s a stand against the technology. I think it’s a stand against being forced to pass the costs of a boondoggle along to the consumers. Being forced to buy power at an outrageous cost, not any other reason.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
