Keeping powerful people safe from prosecution - the how to

This is bad - UK Parliament. Seat of democracy.

Anyone with any sense who was in trouble would come to the whips and tell them the truth, and say now, ā€œIā€™m in a jam, can you help?ā€ It might be debt, it might be a scandal involving small boys, or any kind of scandal which a member seemed likely to be mixed up in, theyā€™d come and ask if we could help. And if we could, we did. We would do everything we can because we would store up brownie points. That sounds a pretty nasty reason but one of the reasons is, if we can get a chap out of trouble, heā€™ll do as we ask forever more.

Itā€™s like House of Cards all over again. Apart from the fact that the Catholic Church claims to be he guardian of morality, there doesnā€™t seem to be much of a difference between this, the Catholic Church, the BBC and half a dozen other scandals. Organisations care more about their reputation than they do about their charges. A compromised employee is a useful employee.

And so the wheel turns. Large, powerful institutions protect their own, and allies when needed.

Another argument for free speech, and all sorts of other basic rights.

1 Like

Christ, some of the comments on there though.

1 Like

Wow, I hadnā€™t gone down there. Iā€™d bet thereā€™s a bunch of Poli-analysts posting.

Many, many 'kippers. ā€˜Benefit scroungersā€™ and ā€˜Lieboreā€™ are bandied about plenty.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed after 956 days. New replies are no longer allowed.