Mark Zuckerberg just dropped another $100M to protect his privacy

[anon85905360]

I would prefer some rule, but the longer it takes, the more ad-hoc it will get.

[onalark]

Yeah, but that was his sister…not him. I’m probably being pedantic here – I guess you could infer that he called his sister in a panic? – but without some sort of tangible attribution, it’s an assumption.

[Phrenological]

He left her quite shaken and distressed (in outward communications) for allowing a private image of himself to be shared with the world.

I don’t know why there’s such a need to be pedantic over not knowing their “true” communications.

There was a lapse of privacy settings that he could not control and leaving him “exposed” beyond his comfort level. We were not privy to the exacts, but from all outside appearances, he dealt with a small bit of what us lesser humans deal every day with his software.

[onalark]

But you’re making a total assumption. She responded to the Vox reporter, not Mark. We don’t know if he cared, do we?

I’m asking for evidence that he in any way cared. Do we have any, or are we making assumptions because it’s easy to do?

[Phrenological]

She freaked because of

• Concern based on what she knows about him as his sister, someone who knows better than you about his motives and intentions.
• Concern based on direct statements from him condemning her for exposing his daily life to the world.
• ?

I trust his direct family to know him better than your sophistry would argue.

[krackatinny]

Don’t you just love hypocrites.