I see. Only one is click counted.
Right. Just to be clear, I wouldnāt expect to be counted for clicking on bothā because it only counts unique users, right? But since itās the same URL for either, I would expect to get counted for clicking on either.
Hmm looks like it might be broken againā¦
Has huffpost oneboxed in the past? I assume yes? Sometimes we see hosts whitelist certain user-agent
strings.
At first glance it looks OK to me in http://debug.iframely.com/ ā what do you think @techAPJ
It used to work, then it broke for a while and @techAPJ fixed it. Now it seems to be broken again. ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ
Deploying latest version here fixed this issue, not sure why this happened again. Will investigate more.
Huffington onebox are working as of now:
Maybe the occasional failure was weird glitch? Will check back next week.
This isnāt doing it. It just isnāt doing it.
https://hyperallergic.com/512514/freedom-of-speech-aichi-triennial/
Looks valid in iframely/debug, but itās wordpress so they are likely blocking this forumās user-agent based on my experience looking at other wordpress sites in the past:
Tweets from users with names in the format of underscore-name-underscore never Onebox properly; the BBS automatically converts the underscores into italics.
Yeah itās a known issue and can be worked around by URL encoding the underscores.
https://twitter.com/_celia_bedelia_/status/1156641213371625472
becomes
https://twitter.com/%5fcelia%5fbedelia%5f/status/1156641213371625472
Are they rotating their shield harmonics, or is the .ca domain throwing it off?
Looks like thereās a bug where a ! in the URL breaks the oneboxing.
Example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Secret!
(This might be the same thing @Wanderfound reported up-thread, and escaping the ! with %21 seems to work around it.)
Wikipedia is hella annoying with their super weird use of unusual characters in URLs. So yeah, youāll need to encode
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Secret%21
would be nice if percentage encoding was something a user could do at the click of a button.
Yeah honestly if it wasnāt Wikipedia the answer would be āthese folks are doing something particularly crazy and should be disabused of these notionsā and thatās kinda still trueā¦ but itās Wikipedia so
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
looks relevant,
On the other hand, it is useful for encyclopedists to punctuate article names (and thus URLs)
U.S. Holocaust Museum links not one-boxingā¦
(I donāt see any underscores.)
Pretty sure they donāt provide any opengraph or oembed data on their pages?
No problem, too bad, understandable. I just had the thought that some people could possible be hesitant to go to a random-looking WWII link based on the URL alone, without a preview of the source.
Next time Iāll do it as a descriptive link when that happens.