Aggressive reply to your post which is entirely off topic. Regular commenters will know this is an attempt to get back at you after a disagreement we had in another comment thread.
Outdated and inaccurate Cold War Era insults citing specious âstudiesâ even more amateurish than the one used in the original comment-trolling editorial by a person from a stereotypically undesirable geographic area to a person from an even more stereotyped undesirable subculture, ultimately resulting in warnings from mods that the desired result has indeed been achieved as intended.
Overly wordsmithed and verbose yet surgically accurate tome setting out the real facts with full substantiation with a tense background tone that tl;dr will be sole response and get back in your box (yet again)
Vociferously endorsed.
Moderator note: Blah, blah, blah, blah!
Passive-aggressive welcome to new commenters implying that theyâre either sock puppets or astroturfers.
Snide jab at our hosts
Pointing out the most obvious things on the subject in the form of assertions. Oblivious to the fact that they have already been knocked down three separate times in the conversation above.
Mike drop.
âThank you for all the hard work you guys do!â that appears oh so rarely.
Thyâr ll hcks, wâr th sprstrs!
Wow, your post was very enlightening. Did you know my cousin makes $888/week posting irrelevant replies to random internet threads about how his cousin makes $888/week? Follow this poorly disguised malware link for one weird trick the government doesnât want you to know about how you can save thousands of dollars on car insurance
the article should have been called something more snappy like â8 Reasons Why this Opinion Piece is Totally Correct & Super Importantâ etc. or one of those other condescending enumerated bullet points style titles that pre-supposes the success of the argument being made
off-topic comment about bananas
Repeat of opinion already made in the comments, because I didnât actually read the comments, or the actual article either.
upset because i did read the article (and comments) and my opinion is still basically a repeat of your previously posted opinion.
The xkcd for this
I call band-name!
Disagrees despite having the same opinion. Calls you a rude name for thinking you disagree when we actually agree.
Obligatory âlook at itâ follow up.
Points out unimportant historical fact based on own dissertation research to combat specious use of a particular historical term. Uses lots of bit words to make point.