Originally published at: http://boingboing.net/2016/10/31/original-176-emoji-acquired-by.html
…
We have a winner. Close the thread.
Kitty cat riding a toboggan.
Like, the original electrons making up the original 1s and 0s? Did he originally paint them in egg-wash on britsol board while looking at a nude woman with x’s for eyes and her tongue hanging out?
Yeah, I RS*TFA and the process or meaning of acquisition in this case wasn’t really clear…
*skimmed…
No zucchini and peach?
For a museum to “aquire” these digital “objects” must mean something different than when an ordinary person just prints out the list and tapes it to the wall. It would take a lot more wine and cheese than you and I will ever have, to do it the same way they do!
Never used these, but hell, I feel old looking at them. I recall the 90s, when they musta looked brand spanking new, like it was yesterday.
Growing old is a bit shit, but I guess it beats the alternatives available…
I can’t wait to hear the audio guide as recorded by Jeremy Irons.
“Critics saw the camera emoji in particular as a foreshadowing of the culture of self-referentiality and meta-ness…”
Come to think of it, I would expect Susan Kare’s Macintosh icons to be of greater artistic significance. I mean, I expect a lot of people would be completely unfamiliar with this specific set.
Yeah. My friends and I have been using imotikons in Korea for much longer. MoMA may want to doublecheck their research.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.