Physicians: “Anal feeding” of prisoners is sexual assault, has no medical use

[anon50609448]

@L_Mariachi

I’m only talking about semantics to point out that it’s not a great idea to make overbroad statements like “any time something is put into one’s body without permission is rape,” as another poster did, not only because it’s inaccurate, but because it invites exactly this kind of hairsplitting at the expense of the real issue.

So you are pointing out that a jerk could derail the thread with hairsplitting by pre-emptively doing the hairsplitting yourself. I hope you don’t use a similar method to point out how vulnerable your friend’s are to punches in the nose.

[L_Mariachi]

I was pointing out that that had already happened.

[dacree]

@jmzero

I’m separating “what they did”, which is clearly wrong, from the general practice of force feeding, which is much more murky.

This isn’t about the general practice of force feeding. This is about anal feeding and anal re-hydration. There is no murkiness to it. Anal feeding is never OK. There is never a medical reason to anally feed someone. Your position is absurd and offensive.

And if you’re rational and made any effort to read, you wouldn’t think I had

Not so. I read your drivel and it’s shameful. You are attempting to derail the discussion by acting as if there is some need to clarify or provide some reason whereby the procedure can be ethically used when medical professionals around the globe have loudly stated that there is no such scenario.

There is no need for the examination you are attempting and it only serves to, at best, distract from the issue at hand. The title of this article is Physicians: “Anal feeding” of prisoners is sexual assault, has no medical use.

[HMSGoose]

Not everyone associates things exiting the rectum with sex. Things entering is a bit of a different breakdown…aside from enemas and suppositories, sex stuff is pretty much dominating that list.