Reduced to ethical bare bones, these arguments all come down to:
- There is an action I can take that will marginally increase my comfort for a period of time.
- I am entitled to take the action unilaterally.
- My action may affect the comfort of a specific fellow human. Not some faceless stranger, not some diffuse group, but an actual real person who is literally close enough to me to touch. A person that I can have a conversation with about my intended action.
- Regardless of the affect my action will have on my fellow human, the increase to my comfort is the only factor I will consider in my decision as to take the action or not.
- If my fellow human doesn’t like what I did, it sucks to be them; I was entitled to take the action I did.