Data taken from a poll of online polls.
Looks like a dead heat, with 51% of poll respondents stating that Marblecake also the game won the debate, 40% thought the debate was won by moot, and 9% undecided.
Because of the unscientific nature of these online polls, there is no way to know the margin for error, although the spokesman for Marblecake also the game stated that the Marblecake 2016 campaign had in no way hacked or tried to influence the polls.
Consensus Iām seeing is that Clinton crushed it:
A CNN/ORC flash poll found that 62 percent said the Democrat won, compared to 27 percent who picked Trump. Thatās on par with 2012, when Mitt Romney was seen as the winner of the first debate.
In a separate instant-poll from the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling, 51 percent said Clinton won and 40 percent picked Trump.
Yeah yeah, I know itās a Conservative rag, but still I tried to find a lot of other sources with polls. CNN and PPP are the only two I could find that favor Clinton:
Hereās the Reddit thread with the discussion about skewing all the online polls:
But really, I have a hard time finding any polls that favor Clinton except for, as I said, CNN and PPP.
Rolling around in the dirt with him doesnāt make her a Liberal version of Trump. It simply means sheās not intimidated by his tactics. Instead of all this āooo, he said bad words, thatās not very nice Donaldā she should focus on why nobody should ever vote for him. Mullah Donald is doing all ISISā recruiting for them, and will be a war criminal from day one should he get into office. He not only doesnāt have the temperament to be President, he barely has the temperament to go outside by himself without a caretaker. If another leader says something that tweaks his ego just a little bit, he will send our troops to war. If someone in the US says something that tweaks his ego, he will restrict free speech and free press like an American ErdoÄan. Even if he himself canāt do it, he will appoint Supreme Court judges who will. These judges will also make rulings that make Citizens United look like the fairest law ever passed.
So if I were Hillary Clinton, I would keep poking and poking at that short-fingered, short-dicked, marmot-headed orangutanās stumpy little ego, until he explodes all over the stage. Itās better he explodes a little now when he canāt do shit about it and it will make him look bad, rather than explode a lot later when the consequences are infinitely worse.
The analysis from FiveThirtyEight shows a pretty clear Clinton win, though it will be at least a few more days before thereās time to really let the data settle in.
Read that as well. Would tend to agree that she won the debate personally, but Nate Silver has been consistently stymied by how this election has been going.
Even he isnāt sure how this debate is going to shake out, which he says as much in that article. Hillary won by just about everyoneās accounts (even white supremacists), but heās not sure that Trump wonāt somehow gain ground from it.
What if Clinton doesnāt improve in the polls ā or they even move toward Trump?
Hence my posts on the topic wondering why all the polls except for 2 skew towards Trump. Guess we should have a clue by the weekend, as Silver says.
Most of the polls youāre talking about are self-selective polls. The two instant polls @Brainspore mentions are sampled polls. They are not at all the same thing.
Silver is all over the place on this one. I figure that he got really lucky a few years back with his polling and since then polling has adjusted to his methods and weāre all back in the dark again. He literally never saw Trump coming to win the RNC.
Sheās being smart? Since when? Sheās in a statistical dead heat against Donald Marmothead Trump! If this is her being smart, Iād hate to see her being dumb.