Anyone else see the article from Reveal News (link to original info from WikiLeaks provided) showing that at least one mega international company, Nestle, is seriously worried about water resources due to meat consumption?
Aren’t I putting this here so that some day, when another poster asks for proof that animals raised for meat consume significantly more resources than eating plants directly, I’ll be able to find it? Hasn’t that happened a few times already on this forum, so don’t I assume that it will happen again? But this time, won’t I be better prepared?
What would be the most effective test of that premise? Should we apply the same test to a random sampling of other threads as a control group?
I don’t know but haven’t I seen it mostly on bbs? And isn’t it particularly effective when the other participant is being a jerk? (Have I seen the argument you walked away from?)
Not today, wasn’t it on Facebook of a friend-of-a-friend who was suggesting that the Golden Rule came from the Jesus-God? Like nobody ever thought of it first? Because all morality has to be the result of a sky-dad person instead of just not being a jackass because people shouldn’t do that to each other?
I just hate it when Christians don’t act like it, don’t you?
Did they get to the part where they tell you that all the other religions that had it prior to them had it stated in the negative form and therefore their version (stated in the positive form) is superior? Doesn’t that part make me laugh because the positive form is functionally broken?
Wouldn’t it be absolutely wonderful if in a month or so, Drumpf would announce that he was dropping out of the election, and that he only pulled this stunt to shake up the US political system?
He can be thin-skinned. He may find a way to leave the race if he feels uncomfortable. I doubt Drumpf could endure the sort of attacks and scrutiny that has been routine for HRC since the early 90s.
Yes, I see you’re right. That’s true too. Ego is strong with this one. But if his brand is damaged, he may feel he has a face-saving alternative by discontinuing the campaign to save his brand. That’s why I think the Drumpf line of ridicule is so compelling.
