Cox snuck in the exemption because it was the christian thing to do, right?
Might there be a federal interest here? Diversion isn’t an adjudicated sentence to my knowledge, so I’m wondering if the 13th amendment applies.
1 Like
Then that would be one of those “crisis pregnancy centers” or whatever misleading name they’re using. It only seems fair to use the same strategy in reverse…
Yeah, both would be real good. Unfortunately one of the things the Trump era is teaching us is that ethics rules are more “ethics suggestions,” norms that apparently have no penalties for violating them, because seemingly up until now the entire government just ran on the honor system…
1 Like
With an unstacked SCOTUS, you’d have a great point. Unfortunately, that’s not the SCOTUS we have.
1 Like
I don’t share your airtight pessimism and besides, SCOTUS ain’t the ones who file suit.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
