I might have to get one of those shirts
8 Likes
That’s amazing!
9 Likes
The point is, no they wouldn’t. Hence reference to the case law on this subject.
3 Likes
You can’t ban thoughts and feelings, but you can damn sure ban information about those thoughts and feelings.
I’ve experienced this many times in my life: I knew I was “different” sexually from a very early age, just based on my activities, but I didn’t even hear the word “bisexual” until I was 18. I wasn’t comfortable with monogamy for many reasons, but without information about alternatives, I didn’t know what else there was. I didn’t know I was nonbinary until I was in my 40’s, despite not really feeling like I fit into my assigned gender.
All of these were thoughts and feelings that I had, but without that outside information, I could have gone the rest of my life thinking I was alone, that there was something wrong with me for thinking and feeling these things.
There’s a verse in Wrong About Gender by The Doubleclicks:
Gay weddings in Boston showed it was ok
If I hadn’t known that I might not be here today
So let’s try telling kids that their joy is a thing we will fight for
The same people that would ban books (and positive coverage of queer events) will absolutely tell kids that those thoughts are bad and sinful, that they’re going to Hell for being that way. Without opposing viewpoints, those kids might not make it out of childhood alive, either at their own hands, or the most “hopeful” situation being dead inside.
Edit: Insert link to Wrong About Gender because it’s an amazing song that makes me cry every time I hear it and I really feel the need to share that.
10 Likes
My goodness, you really haven’t been to a library in a while, have you? As an example, here’s Waukegan Public Library’s catalog. This is the modern version of the “card catalog.”
That’s nonfiction, so Dewey 636.7083 for dogs. (This would cover grooming and training.) 636 is for animal husbandry, so general animal grooming would be 636.0833. (Human grooming is a different area, but you get the idea.)
Please note: You may be able to check out books on your Kindle through your local library!
11 Likes
So, not blue states, but rather anywhere there’s a pocket of red in a blue state.
ETA: Geez Louise, I’m late to this thread!
8 Likes
But hey, who cares what damage that does to the kids being told that, free speech is always more important that their lives anyway… /s 
5 Likes
There was a bit of a push in the pre-revolutionary period in the US to establish church libraries in the colonies. It remained a bit of a thing until the 19th century, but even then other models were dominant for things we think of as libraries . There were the assorted trade and subscription libraries, some of which are still in existence. I guess some of the descendants of religious libraries are still kicking around, the Biblioteca Palafoxiana began as a donation to a religious organization, but is open to the whole public and is no longer a religious institution.
This is a fundamentally different world of library administration than I’ve ever encountered. Our local libraries written policies actually redirect angry people calling for the removal of items to management, with a clearly articulated written appeals process ending with a legally binding decision by the board of trustees, who serve seven year rolling terms to minimize political pressure. When we had problems with local fash interrupting meetings held in the library, the library changed policies to reduce the problem, rather than stopping the meetings.
9 Likes
They warned us! They told that grooming would lead to animal husbandry!
/s
8 Likes
Oh, but it’s the other way around. Animal husbandry is the top level category, grooming is a subcategory. All (animal) grooming is part of animal husbandry, but not all animal husbandry is part of grooming. 
8 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
