Scientist puts his dog on the editorial boards of seven predatory journals as proof of their negligence

boing
21

I’m sorry, your statement has been rejected by a review board consisting of jackdaws and parrots.

3 Likes
22

Just because:

(And that was a “real” journal…)

3 Likes
23

I see your paper, and I raise a chicken…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk

4 Likes
24

Is it wrong to point and laugh at people who ‘publish’ in GJARM (from those bottom-of-the-trashcan OMICS-wannabee scammers Juniper Publishers, of the Hyderabad digital-fraud industry), and who are so proud of being scammed that they boast of their sucker status on Academia?

image
image.png742×485 47.3 KB

25

Fine arts, too:

1 Like
26

I’m told that WeRateDogs assesses her multidisciplinary expertise at “13/10; would scritch silky ears”.

You just don’t argue with an endorsement like that.

3 Likes
27

If there isn’t a list on Wikipedia about animals in research (pun intended), someone should make it. Starting from this thread. And then make it teaching material in scientific writing classes.

1 Like
28

Good doggie!

29
  1. It is not “his” dog.
  2. Your specism is showing.
30

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.