Spotify chooses Joe Rogan over Neil Young

I wasn’t even thinking of legal obligations. That may or may not be something they could use to get out of a contract to. But then again it could be one of those things were Rogan would sue for breech of contract resulting in lots of legal fees or a settlement, so that could be a factor.

I was just thinking, corporations being corporate, that waaaayyyyy more people listen to Rogan’s podcast vs Neil Yong. If there was to be any real pressure in that arena, it needs to be a much bigger name who is popular now threatening to leave.

And like I said, they could just remove those specific episodes. I haven’t listened to Rogan since around the start of the pandemic, depending on if the guest was interesting or not. Ironically the last one I saw was Michael Osterholm at the start of the pandemic who had very good information. They should have him back on. He is now part of Biden’s Covid team, last I heard.

1 Like

There’s been a bunch of them, including some that are paywalled. Mostly from studios or companies with their own ap. But it’s been uncommon till the recent gold rush and Spotify’s contracts with major podcasts have been the most prominent examples.

That said it’s always been really, really, really common to paywall exclusive content for Patreon supporters.

Rogan’s currently Spotify exclusive, though you don’t need to pay for access, and I think when he signed he was the single largest podcast in terms of regular listeners. Iheartmedia (Clear Channel) also took a run at straight up pay walling, and even Sirius has been doing some weird.

It apparently doesn’t work, and it’s been one of the big problems with the podcast craze running around. Apparently it cuts audiences by as much as half, which tanks the ad revenue. Which is what companies were interested in.

As goes subscriptions. Apparently with Spotify very, very few of the people who followed podcasts over ended up paying for Spotify subscriptions. Either to get podcast content or for the music. That’s probably in large part down to just how shitty their ap and service are currently. But from what I understand other companies making the attempt have had similar issues.

So the rest of the industry is moving back the other direction.

3 Likes

It doesn’t have to be big name vs big name. Spotify’s model falls apart if a lot of actual music artists leave. Music is how they got most of their subscribers. They don’t have a business model if their only offering is Joe Rogan. And it gives entirely too much power to Rogan if they did.

8 Likes

Oh, yeah, the Patreon thing - good point. And I noticed (but I’m way behind - years behind) that Sam Harris only does about half hour of show, then cuts it off on the normal feed, anyway. Eh, he was starting to really exhaust me anyway. I hope he pulls/pulled out of that spiral, as he has great guests and I like the way he mulls things over, even if I’ll very much disagree with his conclusions on some things. I might have to look at the synopsis of more recent shows and see…

Another podcast - Deeper Shades of House - has an entire second hour of mixes. Lots of podcasts I listen to do the “bonus episode” thing, too. Up until I just looked into it, I always assumed such shows took extra effort + money; looks like you get a custom feed to put into any app that supports RSS, so not that much effort, I guess.
That seems okay to me if you want to support someone and/or want access to extra/all the content. What I don’t like all that much are shows that go to Soundcloud/Mixcloud - AFAIK, something like Overcast does not support SC/MC because they don’t have a real RSS feed. Or worse: something that is called a podcast, but is not. I’m too lazy to be jumping around between apps/web sites to pull down what should just be on an RSS feed.

The radio personality is Phil Hendrie - although hilarious - offered something he called a “podcast” in the mid-00s and it was decidedly nothing of the kind. You paid monthly, I think, and you could then…go to a website and download MP3s and then load them on a player? So…most definitely very unlike a podcast. :slight_smile: I’m not sure if it’s ever been fixed?

These days I use RhythmBox when I’m using Linux: Apps/Rhythmbox - GNOME Wiki!

It gets the job done? I like Overcast on iOS the best so far, though, and I’ve bounced around between a lot of podcatchers on *nix, Windows, Mac and iOS. My word, has it really been nearly 20 years already?

You’re probably a bit hung up on the term.

At this point Podcast is just a pre-recorded, web bound talk radio.

Even originally the term was an Apple marketing thing, the “pod” part comes from the iPod. And you were downloading MP3s from iTunes, and only iTunes. The RSS approach, and other players that could pull it, was about breaking the market off of the iTunes monopoly.

If Phil Hedrie was doing it via website in the 00’s that’s what that was about. It was not uncommon at the time for people who were eyeballing Apple skeptically.

Apparently iTunes is still the top distribution platform, or at least their charts and subscription mechanics are core to building an audience and establishing ad rates.

Part of the thing with Patreon, and it’s not the automatic good many think it is. Is that there has been very little money in podcasts until recently.

Even on a prominent network that brings ad revenue and has paid subscriptions or pay what you want setups. Not enough money comes through that to pay too many people all that well.

It’s usually enough for the people who run the network, and a few core employees. Like a producer or two.

But even very successful hosts aren’t going to make a living off it. They need that separate stream through Patreon.

Smaller Creators can cobble together something from an avid, small audience.

But there’s a reason most of the people in the field are doing it as part of an overall hustle. They’re all working journalists, comedians, performers.

Even some one like Jesse Thorn who runs one of the biggest and most successful podcast networks. And hosts some the biggest podcasts running.

He’s still working for NPR, he still has Put This On as totally separate operation.

I know people who have worked for some very big podcasts and networks or studios in the space. As writers and producers.

And even if you’re doing that work for multiple shows, regularly. You’re not going to really pay rent if it’s your only job. You really need to be on air and have multiple revenue streams with a following of your own to work it.

That’s changed a bit the last 5 years or so. Ad rates have come up a bit, audiences have grown. Such that some can do it as a full time job even without Patreon. And bigger podcasts and networks can often fairly pay core production staff.

Which is where we get the gold rush.

No podcast brings in enough ad revenue to justify the contract prices companies are paying. Most of the deals aren’t for exclusive distribution or subscription only. They’re tying these things into their ad network. And ad rates are a fraction of even what YouTube videos would pay.

But big media sees a potential down the road. And it’s an attempt to build out these ad networks so they can a corner on the online ad thing that Google and Facebook haven’t monopolized.

A lot of people who have taken these deals have explained them as finally having an opportunity to make money off what they’re doing. Or allowing them to get employees health insurance and what have.

Less “i get to do this full time”, than “these 12 people can finally have one full time job”.

So it’s not just a big check for owners, it’s production budgets and fair ad rates for being on the network. With companies competing to sign practically any podcast with a following or network or studio with a bunch of content. It’s finally driving those ad rates up.

4 Likes

Podcasting wasn’t started by Apple, nor was iTunes ever the main distribution channel for podcasting (except maybe for iPhone users, but that’s mainly a US thing). It was a journalist who coined the term. Distribution by RSS and Libsyn are both older than podcast integration in iTunes and I remember downloading podcasts manually from the BBC website as well.

7 Likes

I’ve never listened to him, although for years, other podcasters would sometimes mention him. I tried to watch that very short-lived show of his where he “investigates” things, but it always seemed he had a Tucker Carlson face on for much of it - like a confused dog that ran into a room and forgot why.

Now, as many boingboingers might be able to appreciate, I’m a huge fan of RAW - it’s how I’ve been lurking here for, well, decades now. And so the whole questioning everything, and skewering rigid mindsets of all entrenched in-groups with their reality tunnels, I can appreciate.

But it seems like some - like Alex Jones, and from what I can tell, Rogan, seem to abuse and warp this to the point where they are just doing the “JAQ” technique so many calcified conspiracy theorists seem to do: “hey, I’m Just Asking Questions, maaaaaaan”. I would like to go back and listen to older (free) content of his and see what he was like pre-COVID. I hope it was better than the TV content was?

The other thing I’ve noticed about public scoldings like this (I won’t say “cancel culture” because that’s so loaded at this point) is that psychologically, it only seems to goad people to double down and become remarkably worse. It’s called the backfire effect in the micro - someone is confronted with facts that contradict their position, and they entrench.

I think this backfire effect is compounded by the fact that people seem to think (both those getting scolded and some of those doing the scolding) that there is no redemption for these people, or at least not without 100% capitulation and some kind of punishment. I don’t know what can be done about that - is there a way to get Rogan to realize the error of his ways on Covid disinfo, for example? Trying to get him kicked off of Spotify, even if successful, is not likely to change his mind, and more importantly, most of his listeners. And are there those that will still not relent, even if he corrected his ways? Meaning, the pile-on effect seems to be so strong in some cases, that I think there is nothing someone could do such that they are “redeemed”, at least in the eyes of the ringleaders of such campaigns?

I don’t know what the real utility of such things is for our society? And I have no idea how we pull back from this. It really does seem that the human psyche is not geared for this level of mass human to human communication just yet.

I remember the same. Also, the content creators can - and do - seem to call all kinds of things “podcasts”, but as an end-user - if it’s not available as an RSS feed, i.e., available to any compliant podcatcher app - it’s decidedly not a podcast, it’s audio being delivered in some one-off/bespoke way. It’s less about the terminology for me, and more about the standards.

I still shudder to think what would have happened to email if various entities had not finally capitulated to SMTP (though corporations like Slack still try to “replace” email). They definitely work to continue fragmentation or create fragmentation in other standards - think instant messaging - how many walled gardens do we need to send simple text from computer to computer? I’d really, really hate to see podcasts get fragmented like this.

2 Likes

No.

The guy’s standup was basically all the conspiracy shit all the time way before he got into pod casting. I remember a friend insisting we listen to one of his specials back in like 2004.

It was all aliens, the illuminati and aren’t mushrooms the greatest.

Very early on his podcast was more one of those comedians talking to comedians things. But it was still massively focused on conspiracy, and even then he was having right wing nuts and questionable “big thinkers” on. Heavily Dudebro and already getting called out for massive misogyny and homophobia.

The early stuff I’ve heard seems much more like other comedians coming buy to laugh at him as he went on rants.

He basically just followed the rest of that same set down the fascist rabbit hole. This isn’t even his first go round with medical misinformation.

2 Likes

See, I would like that part, assuming the first two have a RAW-like take on them. And being open to mushrooms? Fantastic. Also, I love trash TV like ancient astronauts stuff on the now ironically named channels like “History”. :joy: But if it’s humorless and shouty like Alex Jones…naaaah.

Yeah, I could give that a pass…

People shouldn’t underestimate Neil Young

He doesn’t have his own super-fanbase, but he’s everybody’s fourth choice, the one thing a bunch of strangers at a party can all agree to

9 Likes

It does come from the iPod, but it was coined by (former MTV VJ and early internet guy) Adam Curry who, along with David Weiner, also came up with the idea of using rss to distribute audio content

ETA: at least, that is the mythology I am familiar with

2 Likes

there, fixed that for you

2 Likes

Dude has always been an utter piece of shit. Literally always. Anyone who liked him should take a hard look at themselves.

12 Likes

Stephen Colbert Shrug GIF by The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

5 Likes

I know this is a thing in aggregate, but personally if someone I respect makes a pointed criticism it tends to stew. After awhile I find myself changing my opinion. Outside of that specific context I can see how it wouldn’t work. I think studies bare this out and that’s also what I got from this recent podcast (the last segment with Professor Michael Rosenfeld). Neil Young or Joni Mitchell might not be that person, but someone in their life who are fans of theirs might. Rogan’s podcast literally came up at Thanksgiving for me this year.

I don’t know if that actually matters. There have been calls for awhile to have Spotify warn or pull disinformation for Rogan. Spotify bragged about doing it to a bunch of other podcasts. If that was happening I don’t think Young would have pulled his catalog. Rogan can figure out reality on his own time. Sponsors and advertisers should take the heat for having that misinformation represent them.

Someone in some discussion mentioned older music was the largest growth market for streaming. I guess they’ve saturated people who listen to new stuff?

1 Like

It’s mostly like your incredibly high friend badly explaining this thing they just learned that is totally 100% true.

Except he absolutely flips out and gets aggressive if anyone challenges him on it.

It’s not informational at all. Or clear what the fuck he’s talking about. He’s just mouthing off.

His interview"technique" which is the main thing he does these days is to just let other people say whatever they want and say “uh huh” and “you know your right, I’ve never thought of it that way”. Even if that person is actually Hitler.

ETA: oh if you like actual conspiracy content with content, that doesn’t take it too seriously but approaches it as if they did. Check out Last Podcast on the Left.

It’s a True Crime and comedy podcast. But they take frequent breaks for wild nonsense to break up all the horror. They’ll be coming out of a Spotify contract in a couple of weeks.

4 Likes

Yeah I’m misremembering it.

Pertinent bits are distribution without RSS isn’todd.

And iTunes captured the ap based distribution market quickly, and still has outsized influence. Predominantly through their data collection.

Most advertising in the field considers iTunes ratings and charts pretty primary in setting fees. To the point where you’ll pretty commonly hear podcasts closing by asking you to rate and subscribe on iTunes and explicitly saying it’s important because of ad rates.

1 Like

That might depend on the group. I can remember a rather proto-Trump (these types were around long before that game show host came along, he just enabled them) type of roommate I had getting rather worked up over Southern Man playing - to the point where he jumped up and skipped to the next track…same dude liked to yell the lyrics “I hope Neil Young will remember…a Southern Man don’t need him around ANYHOW!” from Sweet Home Alabama whenever he heard that track on the radio/at a bar or whatever…dude was born and raised north of the Mason Dixon line but was butthurt about a song, so, I dunno…

2 Likes