Abstinence from being abused? I think this doesn’t work like they think it does…
Remember, it is always the victim’s fault.
that word they keep using, i do not think it means what they think it means.
Have a pretty good idea how the current SC will rule on this one…
That’s a good question
“Don’t ask, don’t tell, but investigate and report to their parents!” WTF?
“The rules are different for you”
You have to remain silent, hide yourself desperately, fearing at all times that any comment, any glance, any twitch might reveal yourself to the slavering hounds.
We get to pry and probe and forbid you from having privacy or secrets and, when we find something, because we will, we tell your parents, and your friends, and your community, and put it in the newspapers and on television and tattoo it on your face.
God told us that’s what He wants.
See also
This fucking guy. You know, maybe I have gone too easy on vegans…
(I’m kidding!!! He’s not even really a vegan!)
I heard he only eats vegans.
straight from the sovereign citizen playbook. Incidentally, sovereign citizens have also been involved with the Ottawa truck blockade thing. In the rightwing marketplace of ideas, only the least sane will win out.
Off-griders want to move into the unincorporated wilds. The people who already live there want to know what their plans are for water and toilets.
Build a suburb bubble in the woods, hmm. I sympathize with the idea of getting away from it all. (Give me high speed Internet, and I’d be there!) It’s just that there’s more than a little wiff of assholery about the whole thing.
Did you know that Kyle Rittenhouse killed people? True.
You beat me to it
Curious; has there been any kind of talk about civil suits against him for those people he definitely killed? Preponderance of evidence is a very different standard, as OJ Simpson could tell Kyle.
Does he have any money?