Scott Adams with the ultimate pointy-haired boss. Made for each other.
Explains so much.
And the fact that no one was spying on Trump - they were surveilling Carter Page, who was in fact a foreign asset. Trump’s team just had the extreme bad judgement (best case) of hiring a Russian asset. The so-called “FISA abuse” regarding Page was literally lazy paperwork - the reason for the surveillance was spot on.
Flynn was never abused, unless you count self-abuse. Play stupid games (like offering to kidnap a Turkish dissident and deliver him to Turkey), win stupid prizes.
The main point being they are trying to make the Atkinson firing about FISA, even though he was never involved in the FISA process, so there is no reason to be talking about FISA.
(Let’s not talk about Page or FISA in the same breath as Atkinson, okay?)
Fair enough. I was just pointing out that, in addition to the FUD about Atkinson, there were piles and piles of additional FUD in those tweets.
Yes. Arguing within the context of the propaganda narrative is a losing battle though.
That seems overly generous.
Ah. An eight-year-old what, I wonder. Smart money’s on “gibbon.”
More precisely, the shit-flinging orange-faced shitgibbon.
File this under “well, duh”:
With all suitable apologies to righteously offended 8 year olds everywhere. By 8 I had been taught in no uncertain terms that lying was wrong and accepting responsibility for your own actions was expected. #Notalleightyearolds
All I know is the article text says, “Mr Trump speaks at a third- to seventh-grade reading level”
Nightmare fuel.