Yes, but even if it were a bug, how did it not get caught before release?
Itâs the token gator come to play!
This was clearly a technical error, and you are causing more problems even reporting on it.
Yes, the video game industry, and the software industry as a whole, seems to lack QA often.
For a few months I had a job doing market research over the phone (calling people at random from the phone book). Often the people employing us only wanted to research their key demographic (youngish), and so I would awkwardly reject people whoâd agreed to take the survey but were (god forbid) âoldâ.
My job got immeasurably easier once I heard and copied one of my colleagueâs patter who rejected people by explaining weâd already had enough respondents from that age group, rather than that they didnât qualify for the survey because they were over a certain age.
Because thatâs totally whatâs happening in this thread right now; people are screaming bloody murder, bandying their pitchforks and frothing at the mouth as they salivate for âretributionâ everywhere you look!
/s
In what sense does it cause more problems if Boing Boing reports on an error?
#JustUbisoftThings
My parents donât have a basement
It seems to me that most surveys are created by the person you donât trust with anything important.
In the same way that even discussing racism âperpetuatesâ it?
the cynic in me wonders if itâs an reflection of their own internal staffing. âhey guys, take this survey before we send it out.â and, they didnât have a woman in qa.
The thing is, Ubisoft has a pretty spotty record on things like inclusiveness. While I donât doubt this was just a simple survey bug, Ubisoft has a pretty poor reputation here.
Jim Sterling explains:
⌠and âŚ
A âtechnical errorâ caused by not giving a fuck about the input of women.
Iâm probably in software versus social science because I HATED the other people in my capstone team who wrote the dumbest, most leading and horrid questions for the surveys and research we were to perform. Iâm sure theyâre all marketroids.
That doesnât surprise me at all.
I was just referencing the way that so many of these kinds of posts seem to turn out, regardless to the original intent.
Market Research pro here. Short answer: somebody, somewhere was cheap and also dumb.
If you only care about responses from a demo, you have 3 sane ways of doing it:
- only survey that demo
- Allow all completes and filter at the end
- Collect ALL demographic data and then terminate
Option 1 doesnât work on a public survey; 2 is more expensive; 3 requires experience, and provides at least a little bit of cover.
To terminate PER QUESTION instead of terminating at the end of demo probing means 2 things: that they did this in-house instead of hiring a reputable firm, and that they likely donât care about the results so much as they care about how they can use the results.
and Ubisoftâs response, that the survey is now âopen to allâ or whatever doesnât untip their hand - the first thing theyâre going to do with this data is filter out the women anyway.
This isnât market research. Itâs PR.
I am unimpressed.
Well then Iâm really SOL (despite being a regular player of one of their games)!