Well, obviously they achieved all their election promises so thereâs no need to waste valuable storage.
Since everybodyâs paying attention to Russell Brand lately, I hope he makes a bit of a stink over this.
Itâs precisely the sort of transparently duplicitous, blood-boiling because-fuck-you-thatâs-why shenanigans that should get these scumbags bloody fired, no waiting around till the next election.
Just imagine for a moment, that this kind of shit wasnât to be tolerated.
Imagine we could muster a shred of dignity.
Maybe we should just be grateful?
Somehow i think the worst thing about this is just how little iâm surprised about itâŚ
Sadly this is just yet another item in the never-ending stream of lies, corruption and vileness from this cesspit of a government 
(takes piece of paper)
This just in. Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia. And on a lighter note, our cameras capture the public rejoicing as the chocolate ration is raised to 20 grammes a week.
Stay on thus channel for Two Minutes Hate straight after the adverts.
Iâm sure RB could comment on the annual Lord Mayorâs Banquet speech that Cameron gave on Monday:
(In case anyoneâs been under a rock for the last few years, âslimmed down governmentâ means âcutting welfareâ in this context. Cameron wants to encourage a âBuccaneering spiritâ in the UK, that presumably alludes more to state sponsored piracy rather than the social welfare system, strict democracy and open acceptance of homosexuality seen among Buccanneers).
Ok, is it just me, or is the title of the article rather misleading? Putting a robots.txt file in a website doesnât prevent archive.org from keeping records it already has gathered, it just prevents them from gathering new ones.
Websites change all the time, robot.txt files are nothing new and since when is ANY political party obligated to host a permanent library of their works. Political parties ALWAYS have an axe to grind and as such would be the last place I would want to depend on for reference material.
But I guess thatâs me, your mileage may vary.
I thought at first I was looking at satire. The people in the picture do not appear to be squeezed into poverty.
Itâs an explicit example of a political party back-tracking directly on the promises they set out explicitly. Itâs hypocrisy.
We expect, but should never accept, that from politicians.
It fits into a general theme with the current government of rolling back time to some kind of world equivalent to the TV show âThe Fugitiveâ.
Itâs vile.
To be fair thatâs the conservative line. Itâs a school of politics that can be summed up as âme, me, me, meâ.
Still horrible and anger inducing, but nothing new.
Well, Cameronâs from a PR background, so itâs exactly what Iâd expect from the oily-faced bastard. youâd think âStreisand Effectâ was something that would have by now imprinted itself on the Reptileâs brains, if only by dint of sheer repetition, but apparently not.
Yes an no.
You need to explicitly state what needs to be ignored in a robots.txt file, this is an undeniable and conscious decision to attempt to remove information from the internet (any legit crawler will honour that file, because itâs normally used to hide things like admin areas or content that doesnât face the public).
Whether they delete it from their server or not isnât hugely relevant, thereâd be a copy, somewhere - but the fact theyâre trying to hide it is the problem, and it does have an impact on findability - i.e. it obscures it.
Is there a country on the planet whose government doesnât spend all itâs time acting like it hates and despises itâs constituents?
This may well signal a serious position reversal, that people wonât like, in the near future.
Perhaps we should keep an eye if the records re-appear, to see what has changed.
Maybe theyâre going to make @AwfulTheresaMay president.
Fuck, I hope not. Iâve always thought of the Home Secâs job as a kiss of death for PM aspirations, as youâre usually universally reviled for your tenure in the job. Hereâs hoping.
As a bonus, the second picture shows the best example of a Backpfeifengesicht that Iâve seen for a while. Given the content of the article, Iâm not sure that the photo editor wasnât letting us know their own opinion of the story.
Now if they could only just âslimâ down their snooping and melding in affairs that are not their business, rather than taking care of âbusinessâ that is, well, their responsibility.
Donât know about you, but Iâve noticed a desire from the last packs of assorted governments in the UK very willing to shirk what I see as their responsibility as a government. You know the boring stuff like, Health, Education, Energy, Transport. Yes theyâve been very keen to offload all of these responsibilities and replace it with, what? More invasive involvement in our lives, more protections for their pals âthe corporateâsâ, destruction of the environment.
I really canât see anymore how this can even be confused with best intentions, the intentions are clear and itâs beyond any moral reasoning that they, the government are willful in the dereliction of their duties.
Personally Iâd like to see revolution and these types at the end of a rope because they endanger all of us.
In the immortal words of Konrad Adenauer:
âWas interessiert mich mein Geschwätz von gestern?â
âWhat do I care about my babble from yesterday?â
