a chewed-up wing becoming detached from the body of the plane
Going off that description i thought the wing was, you know… basically falling off. But that’s not what the condition of it was, it was certainly not in good shape but it didn’t seem to be as catastrophic as described.
I’d love to see a chart of people who died of a stroke from DVT from sitting in a too small airplane seat for a long haul flight. Because at this point that’s a bigger risk than dying of a broken airplane – at least in North American / Europe.
The last complete-loss-of-airframe accident in the US of regular commercial service (i.e., not tourist-type operations) was February 2009.
Exciting! No, wait The plane flew all the way from SFO to Denver, and landed safely, and no one’s hurt, and the wing’s not falling off. In fact, aren’t the slats actually deployed, in the video? So how exciting is that?
This would be unpleasant to see, but should not cause alarm.
I’m inclined to agree, or possibly some chucklehead with a shoe size larger than their IQ decided to take a stroll on it- IIRC, the slats are a “no step” area?
Or the chart of passengers who lost several years of their lives worrying about incidents like this which may not have been as bad as they appeared, but nonetheless scared the daylights out of everyone on board.
Sure, you all just nod and smile when they ask if you have “the capacity to perform the listed duties”, but no one ever thinks to ask what the “listed duties” actually are. So when the wing starts to delaminate and they hand you a roll of speed tape and tell you to get out there and fix it up, 30,000 feet above Colorado, you have only yourselves to blame. It’s the price you pay for that extra legroom.
Those alter the aerodynamic properties of the plane - flaps on the trailing edge of a wing usually come down on approach for a landing I’ve noticed - but, like, the plane can fly without them, or without altering their positions if needed. Just fwiu.