Watch: 100 Years of Lingerie in 3 Minutes


#1

[Read the post]


#2

More is less? Do my senses deceive me, or is there a man who actually likes women in scanty lingerie? How can that be?


#3

I think it’s not the state of dress that counts, but the direction events are moving in.


#4

The description for 1995 should be “Fucking complicated.” It’s gotta take all damn day to get into that thing!


#5

While that was all somewhat and equally attractive and arousing to me :smiley: - I am now left wondering - what is it that makes lingerie different from underwear now? Or was there ever a difference? Or does it matter?

I’m going to just keep with the assumption figured when I was a pre-teen:
Lingerie = Underwear + sexy pose.
:heart_eyes_cat:


#6

Among the weakest of the 100 years of x in n minutes. But thanks for making boingboing more like buzzfeed.


#7

as Dorothy Parker said, “Brevity is the soul of lingerie”


#8

More evidence to support that I was born in the wrong decade.


#9

Bra-burning in 1965? :information_desk_person:


#10

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.