Oh, Iām very much in agreement with you on that: my point was not that disasters are ever actually pleasant adventures; but about disaster porn, which uses disaster for flavor but is highly sanitized and optimized for enjoy-ability; and carefully elides, ignores, or outright denies the various things that make real disasters suck.
Enthusiasm for real disaster would be deeply strange; but disaster porn is very carefully constructed to combine the appearance of a disaster with basically none of the downsides. Arguably even less accurate in its treatment of disasters than ordinary porn is in its treatment of sex.