Only in America, and the political education there isn’t worth shit. Everywhere else they are the original libertarians (that term was first used to describe Joseph Déjacque in the 1840s)
I have a whole argument about how ‘Libertarian’-Capitalists are neither libertarians or anarchists, as they are incredibly hierarchical and not willing to extend freedom to people working for them (except in an existential sense where you always have a choice because you have the freedom to kill yourself or something equally stupid). I really don’t want to do that (I’m feeling pretty shitty and my clinical depression is kicking in, see Fuck Today for the catalysts) but will if forced.
Remember that Ayn Rand hated being called an anarchist. This was because anarchists are socialists. It’s only been in the last 50 years that those frauds on the right have got away with claiming they are too.
Distinction of the term property is important here
Private Property - The means of production? You and your colleagues.
Personal property? No one should care if you have a television or computer, or how much underwear you have, it’s unimportant to the running of any community. If they do then they’re being an arsehole.
I recommend starting by reading What is Property? by P-J. Proudhon (a socialist, and the ‘father of Anarchism’)
