But you know, to be pedanticâŚ
Ok, so my âwell actuallyâ reflex is going bonkers now, so this is what you get. 8)
[well-actually]
- They are wind TURBINES. They donât actually MILL anything.
- The blades are not made of metal. Normally they are glass fiber or carbon fiber. http://www.wwindea.org/technology/ch01/en/1_2.html
[/well-actually]
Otherwise that joke is super funny. 8)
That reminds me⌠a couple years ago we were driving through central California on the way to Yosemite and we passed a hill with dozens and dozens of turbines on the crest.
âOh look, a wind farm.â I said, then corrected myself. âActually, I guess they donât really grow wind here. Itâs more like a wind catch-and-release program.â
I like that! âa wind catch-and-release program.â
So. On probation then. What did the wind do?
âŚonly because the topic came up.
One of the things that I find fascinating, regarding our efforts at renewable energy, is the subtle environmental impact that they have. A field of wind turbines generate some energy in the form of electricity, which is removed from the wind (because the wind is exerting a force on the turbine); therefore, wind speed would be reduced. The same with generating energy from waves, would reduce the amplitude of waves reaching shore.
So, itâs less a catch-and-release program, than it is a wind tax?
Same with all energy production. Solar power means thereâs slightly less warming of the surface the sun hit than there would otherwise be, and slightly less energy reflected back into the atmosphere. Thermal means thereâs slightly less kinetic energy buried in the ground. Coal and oil means thereâs less energy in the bonds of the molecules. Nuclear means thereâs less energy in the configuration of the atom.
We canât create energy from nothing.
It would be interesting to know what kinds of effects the wind power fields have had in a place like Tehachapi. Theyâve had wind power generation since the 80s, though itâs been growing for most of that time. Environmentally, is it enough to notice?
[well-actually] Only Force 7 on the Beaufort scale (50-61 km/h) is referred to as a âwindâ. This is probably above the design speed of most turbines, so they are properly called Strong Breeze or Less Turbines. [/well-actually] 
Nothing bad, but itâs managed to ruffle a few feathers and stir things up in too many places. Itâs always going around trying to get peopleâs dander up.
That sounds like something my niece would repeat three or four times per visit⌠except as a knock knock joke:
Knock knock!
Whoâs there?
Windmill
Windmill who?
Iâm a big metal fan! [giggles madly]
Well, actuallyâŚ
I think youâll find that the colloquial definition of âwindâ as any movement of the atmosphere, not strictly bound by upper or lower speed limits, existed far before the technical listing of different rates of movement into various categories, and neither do the technical definitions supersede the colloquial.
When youâre chatting and just want to mark comment on the movement of the atmosphere, then referring to it as âwindâ is perfectly cromulent, even if you know the exact windspeed and are familiar with the Beaufort scale. And (most) people will understand what you mean, and not seek to pin you down more exactly. Use of the Beaufort scale is only appropriate if you are making a technical report on the weather and are reporting on the windspeed, since that is the only use of the scale.
Beaufort âwindâ does not replace the common understanding of âwindâ, any more than the digital definition of âbitâ replaces the common understanding of the word as âa small piece of somethingâ.
I knew it! Always thought it was a bit shifty.
Iâm not a huge Apple fan.
Reminds me of this Threadless classic:
In what way is it a means of keeping oneself cool?
Your niece sounds awesome.
Wind toll?
