Just to put a face on things, since that too is a matter of public record. This photo also seems to establish that he is properly and securely white (I wonder if UKIP would even have him otherwise?)
I just saw that on his blog, Councillor Parr posts without comment, and no doubt approvingly, the recent bit of elitist agitprop, Brexit: The Movie. I then enjoyed this review of it (which explains why I would very much not enjoy watching it).
The film is more evidence, it seems, that entrenched British elites know just as well as those in the US do how to direct the attention of the masses away from themselves and their exploitative power, and onto (darker) supposedly threatening others.
Of course they are talking about the Council and the Commission who were never to be found on any ballot they cast, in stark contrast to the UK cabinet.
Can I just state, for the record, that even more so than the habit of throwing “-gate” at the end of any controversy, that “Brexit” is my most despised made up word ever…
Actually the House of Anjou had serious relations to nowadays Italy (Naples, Sicily). So a darker, more mediterranean complexion isn’t entirely unreasonable.
Indeed. And wonkstain and Cllr Wood are going to be even less happy when they hear about The Merchant of Venice, As You Like It, Twelfth Night, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, Cymbeline, The Taming of the Shrew, and The Merry Wives of Windsor.
You can object to the idea that UKIP is a racist party all you want, but is your point that it is absurd to think there might be 3.9M or more racist voting-age people in Britain?