Not that many. Mostly they were images of this woman.
Oh, there’s more:
She’s Michelle McGee and is apparently a genuine white supremacist. Might have skipped the original picture if I’d known that. Frankly, I thought it was either kitsch or an attempt at a dominatrix vibe. (Not into the whole Nazi or dominatrix bit, but I can certainly see how they might go well together for some.)
You’re a braver mutant than me! I mean… WWWWHHHHHYYYYY???
Why is she a neo-Nazi (or whatever)? She’s a moron is a good enough answer for me. One could probably go into more depth, but why?
Into racism for the edginess factor? I’ve seen a few people torpedo their own careers due to Nazikitsch posts on social media. Like, they’re going for the cool/shock factor but forget the underlying lack of humanity/empathy bit. And because people are just too sensitive. Also Freeze Peach. Because SJWs. Or that’s the excuses they fling about when caught, anyway.
Perhaps. To be fair to Ms. McGee, the link I posted above was to the NY Daily News, perhaps not the best source for reliable info. So, maybe she’s not committed to white power and is simply “edgy.”
Yay, for her.
I dunno. But it does seem that some spout racist/sexist memes to be controversial for the sake of it, rather than having any particular investment in those ideologies.
It’s pretty irrelevant to me. If it looks like a bigot and it quacks like one, I really don’t want to spend too much time examining the motivations behind it.
Traditionally, it’s more that that succubi target men and incubi target women. They aren’t really male or female in human terms- they assume a form that will be pleasing to their target. If that target is a gay man, you’re going to get a succubus that looks like a man.
Nominative determinism in action!
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
