They banned spanking? In England?
While most of the prohibitions could be justified on the basis that they are a bit extreme, banning female ejaculation but not the male equivalent seems like blatant sexism.
It’s because they deemed it to be urination rather than anything else… and SEXY URINATION IS WRONG!
They couldn’t even be arsed to look into it enough to determine what it really is before banning it?
Isn’t “urinating onto someone” and “female ejaculation” redundant?
Well, they looked into it, but the science (that they used) said urine.
Isn’t it always, though; isn’t it always.
I can urinate onto you while not
- being female
- ejaculating
Indeed, condition 1) is largely impossible for me, and urinating whilst 2) is probably physiologically off the table.
You’ll have to buy me dinner first.
You’re reading that Venn diagram of redundancy backwards.
Female ejaculation does not involve urine any more than male ejaculation does. Maybe do a bit of reading on the subject before dismissing it so thoroughly?
I did. The research suggests you’re incorrect.
the latest i’ve read was that female ejaculate was quite-similar-to-but-not-exactly-the-same-as urine, in that it shares most compounds, but lacks a few, and comes out of the same meat.
anyway, even if it were urine, the classification would be “redundant” in the same way that spitting and drooling are the same thing. chemically, they are very similar, but that’s not the whole story.
Are you talking about this study?
A closer read will show you that you’re conflating at least three separate biological mechanisms: typical urination, female ejaculation, and what the paper calls “squirting”, which is kind of a combination of the two that only some women experience. The article explains it better than I could.
For some reason the poster omitted the detail that the ban relates to Porn films and not your personal life.
Banning visual images of an act is a big first step toward banning the act.
it says “porn” in the headline, doesn’t it?
While we’re talking about porn as opposed to real life, is it the case that the “female ejaculation” often seen in porn is often in fact urination?
It’s been banned now in the boarding schools that, basically, were responsible for the whole English vice thing.
Just as well because many of the pupils there are sons of Russian and Chinese oligarchs, and you really wouldn’t want to try to hit kids whose fathers emply hitmen, or you might get polonium on your cornflakes, or an accident with a meat clever down a dark alley.
