xeni at October 14th, 2013 18:09 — #1
seyo at October 14th, 2013 18:21 — #2
Vegans, pretend it's soy.
Impossible, vegans have no sense of humor.
phoenixk at October 14th, 2013 18:28 — #3
Vegans, get over yourselves.
ayprof at October 14th, 2013 18:39 — #4
Vegans, get under yourselves.
rindan at October 14th, 2013 18:48 — #5
How can you tell if someone is vegan? They will fucking tell you.
eksrae at October 14th, 2013 18:56 — #6
Ate a vegan once...
Dry and judgemental.
uberalice at October 14th, 2013 19:09 — #7
You can always tell a vegan.
But you can't tell them much.
algomeysa2 at October 14th, 2013 19:18 — #8
Those old ads were right --- milk really does do a body good!
samwinston at October 14th, 2013 19:55 — #9
Geeze and boingboing was just complaining about guys objectifying women at a comiccon a few posts ago....so now we have a these male fantasy cream shots. I guess it's different when you pay models.
Snark aside: great pictures.
errol at October 14th, 2013 20:06 — #10
Why the anti-vegan sentiment?
prestonsturges at October 14th, 2013 20:27 — #11
That milk seems to be pretty cold!
robulus at October 14th, 2013 20:59 — #12
Amazing images. Super hot. Love it.
samwinston at October 14th, 2013 22:54 — #13
You could have shortened that comment to "Great Nipples, Sugar Tits"
shane_simmons at October 14th, 2013 23:09 — #14
I don't know if I'm going to respond with snark or not, but I'd say it's different. On the one hand, you have women at a con who are dressed, sure, scantily, at a con. But there, you have creeps taking creeper shots because they're creeps. Here, you have pro photographers who have agreements with the models, who surely know that at least some people will see this as erotic and arousing. Which it is, yeah, but it's also a pretty neat technical and artistic achievement.
milliefink at October 14th, 2013 23:37 — #15
And to be clear, I think it's in the comments, not in the OP.
mike_hanrahan at October 14th, 2013 23:48 — #16
The older I get, the harder it is to take art photography like this seriously. On the one hand, most of the images are striking visually. On the other hand, hasn't art photos = tits been kinda played out at this point? How much more is there to be said by covering women's faces while uncovering their breasts?
Male gaze, something, something, objectification, mumble mumble, but still pretty, garble warble poot.
technogeekagain at October 15th, 2013 00:13 — #17
I'm tremendously impressed that they were able to figure out how to get the shapes they wanted out of liquids. The fact that those shapes tend to drape like fabrics, for me, makes using them to reconstruct classic pin-up shots entirely reasonable.
Erotic? At about the level of the pinups they recreate, meaning pretty tame by today's standards.
I wouldn't have objected to seeing male equivalents, though you'd have to find cultures in which men wear flowing robes to make the images work.
prestonsturges at October 15th, 2013 00:16 — #18
halloween_jack_ at October 15th, 2013 00:20 — #19
Quite honestly, I found myself both marveling at the expertise involved and a little squicked out by the symbolic bukkake.
steampunkbanana at October 15th, 2013 00:55 — #20
What if it wasn't milk, same reaction?
next page →