$10,000 audiophile ethernet cable

Coherent Air is the name of my New Age cover band.

2 Likes

Jeez, man, if you do it backwards you hear all kinds of Satanic shit.

If you’d buy cables like these, you’d probably appreciate the music better that way anyway.

One of these days, someone is going to have to investigate whether the people who sell stuff like this believe their own bullshit.

1 Like

To be fair, you can spend several hundred dollars on network cabling without feeling too ripped off:
http://www.diablocable.com/7m-qsfp-to-4-sfp-breakout-splitter-24awg-passive-octopus-cable.html
But you’re going to be spending tens of thousands on the equipment you’re connecting.

My favourite is this speaker cable at ÂŁ54,415 per pair for five metres.
http://www.futureshop.co.uk/product_info.php?currency=GBP&products_id=5958#.U4b0Fyjm6ls

For best results, use it with British-made high-end audio equipment that breaks all the fucking time.

2 Likes

In all seriousness I would spend some real money on cables that were cat proof.

4 Likes

Yeah, my system probably sucks. I suppose I should throw away a few thousand bucks on audiophile placebo.

1 Like

That’s what I hear playing it forwards. It’s the whole point of black metal.

2 Likes

Maybe there’s a rule of thumb (pushed by salesmen) that budgets some sizable fraction of the budget to cabling. And since you can buy ludicrously overpriced speakers, there are apparently budgets that misallocate thousands of dollars to cables. It’s the same thing as being asked to buy a HDMI cable for $40 to hook up a $70 bluray player, though in that case, Best Buy etc have a (temporarily) captive market, and overprice all the cables.

BTW the reviewer of that pair of speakers was involved in the as yet unclaimed James Randi Educational Foundation million dollar challenge (and not in a wholly admirable capacity, either)

I’ve seen someone on a forum claim with a straight face (well, I assume a straight face was worn while typing it)
that 10% of the amount spent on the sound system should be spent on cables.

With loudspeakers you have the concepts of engineering, design and build quality. But with a cable, as long as you get all the electrons out on the other side, it’s good.

1 Like

That has been done.

To terminate the cable, separate the pairs, and twist them together, all coloured ones for one pole, and the white ones for the other pole. Cut, and untwist just enough to strip the ends. Retwist, and terminate. I prefer banana plugs, spades tend to work loose.

You can expect to use 10-15 hours making a pair of cables 3 m long.

At a living wage of 13.22 per hour, that’s a $200 speaker cable.

1 Like

I’ve never liked that kind of calculation.

If you do it in your spare time, it’s probably not because you’re trying to save the money, it’s because you enjoy making it. And from an economical POV, it’s not like you would realistically have done paid work for those hours if you weren’t making speaker cable, so you’re not actually losing any money.

2 Likes

No. It’s two months’ salary. Well, for the diamond cables at least.

4 Likes

Does anybody actually buy these cables? Or these listings just numbers stations?

1 Like

Uh what? You’re not making sense.

Diamonds are overpriced.

The idea that a man should spend a significant fraction of his annual income for an engagement ring originated de novo from De Beers marketing materials in the mid-20th century, in an effort to increase the sale of diamonds. In the 1930s, they suggested that a man should spend the equivalent of one month’s income in the engagement ring; later they suggested that he should spend two months’ income on it. In 2012, the average cost of an engagement ring in USA as reported by the industry was US$4,000.

4 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.