I agree, of course. Michael Harriot has been very anti-Sanders and I don’t agree with everything he says on that (although I do agree with him on many things). That also doesn’t mean that this point of view isn’t valid, though. The point that the black electorate isn’t a monolith is important, I think, and that the same kinds of issues often split the black vote especially in the primaries.
Dunno what is about that, but the order of candidates being randomized is, AFAIK, a pretty universal system to avoid bias by alphabetical order, or whatever.
Tangent: Here in Finland, when there’s an election, the party lists are put in randomized order, with the first list starting at 2 – there is never a candidate #1, because that would bias things – and running as long as there are candiates on it, then the next list starts, and so on. Sometimes, this means that one of the teeny-tiny parties which don’t even have a parliament presence are listed first, which I think is kind of an analogous situation to Gabbard.
Philadelphia has The Coffee Can of Destiny. Candidates pull out a numbered ball in a big ceremony from a 40 year old Horn & Hardart coffee can to determine their ballot position.
Perfect for the coronavirus era. (They were still around when I lived in the area long ago; not the worst place to hang with a date when you were a poor college student.)
You don’t know how conspiracy thinking works, apparently. This definitely feeds conspiracy theories. Partly because everything does. But also, [conspiracy]We know Pelosi doesn’t want Sanders to win, right? So why would Pelosi want Sanders to stay in if they didn’t know the fix was in?[/conspiracy]