Wash them first, yeah?
11 Likes
This is one of those Am I the Asshole? Reddit threads, and it seemed like most of the comments were supportive of the woman in the relationship, but lighthearted in poking fun at the guy. No one seemed to be struck by what she said at the end of her OP, which made me think this is another âlone wolfâ waiting to happen:
This whole argument is really weird to me. Basically, Iâm on my period and my boyfriend said offhand he was glad he didnât have to deal with that and said something along the lines of, âI bet you wish you had a dick.â To which I responded, âno, not really.â
He seemed kind of taken aback by that and pressed the issue of exactly why I did not want to have a dick and I basically told him male genitals seemed really uncomfortable and awkward to possess, like I donât want some meat and a nut sack just chillin in my britches. Hard pass. He got weirdly offended by this and said I was being sexist??? I told him that I observe him scratching his nuts or rearranging his junk multiple times a day and that it would make me crazy if I had to constantly attend to my genitals like that. He got so mad about this to the point he stormed off to let me âthink aboutâ why what I said was so upsetting.
I donât get it though? Not 5 minutes earlier he was trashing vaginas and periods, but thatâs okay, for reasons? Yâall help me out lmao
EDIT: Itâs funny yâall keep mentioning Freud. My boyfriend is studying psychology and actually obsessed with Jung. Like yâall know that post about that guy who was obsessed with Jordan Peterson to the point his girlfriend left him? Heâs that level obsessed with Jung.
17 Likes
I mean, clearly, this guy is actually angry that his girlfriend doesnât think being a man is so much better than being a woman. And he studies psychology âobsessivelyâ. This is not a safe combination, as weâve seen.
16 Likes
Nah she isnât. While I donât want lady parts and the issues that go along with them she is right about the man bits not being all that great.
8 Likes
the acronym DTMFA comes to mind here.
9 Likes
And change the locks, and never let him in the door again, no matter what he says.
13 Likes
At the very least the âleave you to think about what youâve doneâ is a red flag, especially so for a situation where all youâve done is say youâre happy with the genitals you have. Like what is he gonna do if the answer is âyep, Iâd do the same thing again.â
16 Likes
Because she would be better off without a dick
8 Likes
Sheâs definitely better off without that dick.
20 Likes
Because she would be better off without a dick
NightflyerBBS Regular
Sheâs definitely better off without that dick.
â-finally - a thread where I can speak with full authority on both counts.
18 Likes
Canât you just xxx already?
8 Likes
11 Likes
Fred at Slacktivist is normally so much more measured in his take-downs of the Evangelical community âdoing it wrongâ. This has clearly hit a nerve, or else heâs just finally out of spoons:
9 Likes
Fred Clark is a priceless treasure.
3 Likes
I donât want to threadjack here for Mr. Dershowitz, but I think recent posts and statements paint the negative space of his involvement with Epstein.
Constitutional argument for national age of consent for 15/16 year olds?
An admission that he got a massage at Epsteinâs place (but kept his boxers on)?
This is a guy who was NAMED in a court case against one of his CLIENTS, which spawned a new case which he QUIETLY SETTLED. Why would you avoid shutting the fuck up on topics which make you look guilty in the public eye? Let alone invite further scrutiny?
The only answer I can come up with came to me with his admission about the massage. Why admit to a massage at all? That seems insane given his connection to the case. Itâs because thereâs Epstein girls that can describe what his body looks like, and he needs to get ahead of it.
8 Likes
So much ewwwwwwww
11 Likes
16 Likes
13 Likes
So he just learns enough to do a better job the next time he wants a woman dead. Greaaat.
12 Likes
