https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/22/entertainment/axl-rose-sexual-assault-lawsuit/index.html
oopsâŚaint over yet, puffy;
Hard to believe itâs been 13 years. Wow.
I donât know where else to share this, but misogyny is a big part of the story here. One interesting thing I learned in this video: While the Marvels is, to date, the lowest earning MCU film, itâs also the biggest earning film opening with a black woman director. Anyway, this video covers a lot more ground than just that, so itâs not all about misogyny. I just wasnât sure where else to share this, and I think itâs a really good video.
The Washington Post is very worried that American women donât want to marry Trump supporters
That op ed
I wish the various outlets would stop publishing this shit. Letâs see some real analysis of the real problem. It ainât women
Well, now, lassie, the real problem is that us wimmin are allowed to work now, and make our own money, and so we expect more from men than to just save us from culturally-mandated starvation or prostitution if we donât subjugate ourselves to their will.
Even before the political divide, a lot of men had a hard time adjusting to the idea that they had to be more than mere breadwinners. Some still do.
I didnât quite understand what the highlighted bit in the below paragraph is getting at.
But misogyny thrives on the left too. The cause of womenâs rights comes way down the pecking order for some progressives, below more fashionable issues like race and gender identity. How else to explain the leftâs tendency to ignore or sideline Asian women inconveniently flagging sexism within their own communities; or that some people see it as a âprogressiveâ cause to get women who think sex cannot be replaced by gender identity the sack?
Of course there is misogyny on the left, but is she saying that trans activists are part of the problem? I honesty donât understand what that sentence is saying or referring to.
I read that part a couple of times, too, before interpreting it as a poorly constructed both-siderism salad with some classic divide and conquer language sprinkled on top.
Ok, then it wasnât just me. There was also some completely unnecessary complaints about intersectionality that came across to me as âWonât someone think of the white women?â
Given this is the UK Guardian I interpreted that sentence to mean "and some people on the left think it is a progressive cause to get TERFS fired for being exclusionary assholes. "
âwomen who think sex cannot be replaced by gender identityâ = TERFs having a fit about terms like âpregnant peopleâ and âpeople who menstruateâ and TERFs generally wanting everyone to be defined by their âbiological sex.â
TERFs arenât feminists. No matter what they claim
I agree, so it kind of rubs me the wrong way that the article is saying that we should leave the poor TERFs alone.
The whole tone of the article seems to shift about halfway in and the second half sounds like, âHey, everyone whoâs not a cis white feminist, please stop complaining about the cis white feminists.â