America outdoes itself with not one but two school shootings in a single day

You said I was wrong to say they were innocent. I wasn’t. They were 100% innocent of anything that gives a private citizen the right to execute them - No fallacy there.

You LITERALLY tried to excuse them being killed, I pointed that out - No fallacy there.

YOU then made it personal

Quite the ad hominem.

You asked me a question, to which I responded with salient points - No fallacy there.

You then made a bizarre comment about how people are upset because 2 mass shootings have happened. I tried to clarify exactly what you meant by that - No fallacy there either.

Then a movie recommendation.

It sounds like guns in Switzerland are owned and maintained by citizens trained to fight in a well regulated militia.

That’s just so counter to what it talks about in our Second Amendment.

/s

10 Likes

Can you imagine what the world would be like if the US lived up to its own promises?

4 Likes

Most likely not all. About 700,000 guns are issued by the army (public property for active militia members and service weapons owned by former militiamen), the estimates for privately owned guns in Switzerland range from 2 to 4 million.

Possibly a religious response…Marxism is an ideology after all.

I think that America has an ideological history also that manifests it’s self in things like “live free or die” and so on, on top of a liberal " I can do what the fuck I want " that precludes a disciplined approach to gun control like Switzerland, which involves mandatory military service.

I agree.

American youth needs to find some discipline and avoid the lazy intellectualizations that support that laziness.

Is there any social stigma between military served and gun-owning families and those without?

I’d suspect neither group flaunts that status. I’m very curious.

I’m not aware of any stigmata, but the Swiss I know don’t own weapons*.

Mostly I wanted to show that most guns in Switzerland are not put in circulation by the army.

*) a friend of mine was drafted when it was normal to keep the service weapon at home. for me as German it was fucking weird to walk into his room and nearly trip over an assault rifle

2 Likes

I thought that after fulfilling the service requirement the guns went home with the former military person, but without ammunition. Is that wrong? Because if you include everyone who has ever served in the Swiss military, that covers a large number of households.

What a lazy pseudo-intellectual thing to say.

3 Likes

Your knowledge is a little bit outdated :smile:

The Armee 95 program (do I have to translate this? ^^) had 400000 active soldiers, the sum of conscripts in training, regulars (mostly officers) and the militiamen with only a few camps (2 weeks per year? I’m not sure) until the age of 40 or so.

Armee XXI, in effect since 2003, halved the army size - leading to shorter terms of militia service and much higher unfitness rates (not exactly pushed, but as they don’t need anyone anymore it’s easier to skip…).

After leaving the active army service it’s possible to keep the weapon (the assault rifle defanged as semi-automatic), but this is not regarded as “national duty” anymore.

With the exception of a few chosen units the active militiamen don’t have ammunition at home (since 2007 afaik), and even the rifle can be stored in an arsenal.

3 Likes

And that’s why I asked…I’d rather learn current facts than keep repeating outdated info. Thanks!

2 Likes

To be fair, its a pretty good movie :wink:

and yes adding that to the gif bank now.

5 Likes

Can you make a gif out of the stool stool unicorn with the same text?

I grabbed that one from the intertubes, and no, not really into making that kind of thing. When I am not avoiding work I am usually playing video games on the non work pc.

It was worth a try :slight_smile:

1 Like

Well yes, but no more than the sophomoric Marxism held out as thought in places here.

Specifically, the cultural vacuum known as America allows pop stars to educate, and until such time as that changes, we will have what we have.

I don’t generally think of Limbaugh, O’Reilly, etc. as “pop stars”.

2 Likes

That’s political

I’m talking about the real teachers. Those who affect youth.