Not turning out at the polls is the defining feature of a non-voter.
You gotta remember that on Hillaryworld, the only test of ethics is âJailâŚor no jail?â
If keeping the transcripts is legal, she figures itâs none of the votersâ damn business.
Iâll see your Randall and raise you a Mitchell:
Got a new member!
I donât know⌠considering the shit on the republican side this year, isnât the democratic side still tame and close to the issues that voters actually care about? How bad is it that heâs pointing out, you know, facts?
Yeah, I think itâs the corporate media thatâs going to try to make it seem âuglyâ on the Dem side. I think theyâre already doing that. I suppose an upside would be that it at least constitutes acknowledgment that Sanders is giving Mrs Clinton a solid run for her (rich folksâ) money.
and the details of Clintonâs speaking engagements on Wall Street?
On paper, my household is worth more than Sanders. Not that meaningful. Heâs an old dude and I expect he owns a home that heâs had for decades and maybe a few investments.
How many Wall Street paid gigs has he had with bookoo speaking fees?
Donât you see that just doesnât matter? He hasnât quickly released his full tax returns for (what was it again? oh) the last fifteen years (I think thatâs the demanded number now). That. Means. Heâs. HIDING SOMETHING!
Donât be a Bernie Sheeperson. Stop paying attention to how much of a fat cat of the very sort that Bernie wants to topple the Goddess Hillary is!
There is also no law requiring that Sanders disclose his tax returns but @art_carnage is all over that one like white on rice. It is also as if heâs biased and only concerned with any appearance of impropriety with one candidate but not the other.
We could also discuss which candidate is likely to be prosecuted for misleading the government investigators and putting classified information on a personal email server but Iâm sure thatâs not going to come back to bite her come voting timeâŚ
Iâm watching it right now.
Because thereâs a long standing tradition, going back to the 1970s, of presidential candidates releasing transcripts of speeches they made as private citizens⌠oh, wait. No there isnât. Simply doesnât exist. Itâs almost like someone just made it up, for one particular candidate. But that would never happen, would it?
I dunno. Youâre the one banging away about the tax returns (released) of a man who makes less a year than Clinton does in a couple of her speaking engagements to her wall street buddies.
Iâm sure youâre deeply concerned about what things she said to them that might indicate her cozy relationship with them and how she might behave towards them in the future, right?
Oh, how do you feel about her putting of classified secrets on her personal email server in violation of all sorts of regulations? Do you take Clinton supporters to task for that too?
Iâm not sure why you keep posting the same things in this thread.
We get it. Youâre a partisan Clinton supporter and she can do no wrong and youâll find something bad in what Sanders is up to. We can all see it. You donât need to keep doubling and tripling down on it. Go hang out on @khepraâs Clinton Circlejerk thread.
If youâll look at my first message, I just mentioned the tax thing as a throwaway aside. Itâs the Sanders people who then went ape shit over it.
Iâll ask again: Whatâs the upside for Sanders to not release his taxes?
(BTW - Since1976, when candidates first started releasing their tax returns, all of the candidates who refused to do so have lost. Just sayinâ.)
Wait. I thought you said itâs the law.
Iâll ask again, why canât you wait a little? Itâs been four days and heâs mentioned that he doesnât have immediate access. Unlike Clinton, he canât fly a flunky on a private jet to his mansion to get his paperwork (or, more realistically, call his in house staff team in his mansion to go pull files for him).
So youâre saying you didnât back Clinton in the primary you already voted in and youâre not one of her supporters just attacking Sanders in online forums?
He âmisspoke.â