I hate to be the one to tell you this, but if you were in college in the 70s you almost surely are eligible for AARP membership.
Incidentally, my read of the article was that the cost was for all the hair work Netanyahu had over the course of his trip, not each haircut. If he had 2-3 public appearance every day, and paid someone to comb his hair before each one, this is still outrageous but more in the $100/per category.
I took his story (and my reply) as eating a triple cone for $0.45 in the 70’s, and his roommate working for Farrell’s during his college years. (Two separate time periods.)
But you’re correct that AARP eligibility starts at 50, and I really don’t want to talk about that. (My internal age is less than 50.)
WTF . . . they keep lowering it. That’s not too far off for me; if I get an application packet in the mail anytime soon I’m going to set something on fire.
All that expense and he’s not even getting color done; that’s what costs me the big bucks
I’m not sure if they’ve mined me yet, but my husband started getting then when he turned 40. I think they confused him with his parents? Both our AAA cards have us listed as 47 year members, which means I’ve been driving since I was seven.
Bruce Sterling’s Islands In the Net called this kind of thing out in 1988, I will add. That novel hypothesized a world so gasp inundated with HD video technology, well-known personalities who might find reason to appear in HD video would have to put major effort into looking as good as possible when broadcast (or narrowcast). That book also had a very compelling view of how armed attack drones might be used for assassination efforts in… The Future! Yeah, we’re there folks. I just spent an hour in virtual reality for goodness’ sake.
Just do what I did: get the membership, use the discounts, and don’t read the magazine with its infuriating stories of people 20 years your senior being far more active than you are.