As borked as the delegates system for democratic candidates
1 Like
I donât think Trump ignores the consequences of being considered an arsehole; he just calculates thereâs more mileage in it.
2 Likes
Well, nice to see where everyoneâs mind is at. So, the threadâs run itâs course then? Is that what I should gather? Should I even bother reading back through the prior posts, or did it just turn into the typical shit show with Falcore having to chomp some trolls and then the discussion shifting to things completely unrelated to the original post?
2 Likes
It was reasonably sane this go around so feel free to read it if you like. I think the crowd that should not be named finally learned they get banned hard here⌠or we have dropped off their radar.
6 Likes
Probably some is, but itâs so hard to tell whatâs deliberate manipulation and whatâs simple obnoxiousness with Trump.
1 Like
Heâs a total enigma in that regard⌠The crap he comes out with is so goddamn stupid, but then so is half the electorate - in hindsight heâs an artist par excellence.
2 Likes
Watch gameplay videos. It fares much better in motion.
No, it doesnât. I hate gamergate, but this game does look aesthetically horrible
â@Spacekatgal Bottom line: YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. <3 <3 <3
10:33 AM - 12 Feb 2016â
We should all remember to tell each other that more often.
Trump is the social equivalent of a black hole?
(in that all discussion is inevitably drawn toward him until it reaches a singularity of unbelievable density)
Give the people what they want.
Many of those people have been well trained (and poorly educated) for yearsâŚ
So why donât we all start ignoring the asshole and get on with things?
2 Likes
Hey buddy, get your subjective shit out of here.
If you donât think Phil Fish or Marcus Person ever got a couple tweets because they made games they looked like they could have been ran on an Atari, please do a little research.
The difference is that when they got criticism, white knights like Cory werenât running around saying they were the victims of institutional misandry, or even xenophobia (considering they are both non-Americans).
You canât just claim that everything plays into this bigger picture issue without any evidence of the bigger picture issue.
This is worse than the red scare.
Hey buddy!
Are you saying this wasnât misogynistic at all?
Good luck with that buddy.
5 Likes
14 Likes
Those of us who might rather ignore him arenât quite free to pretend he doesnât exist because of his significant following and influence.
We can avoid giving free press thoughâŚ
2 Likes
Hey guy, get your shit understanding of history out of here.
A âcoupleâ tweets? Let me repeat something I already wrote to you: Context and nuance are a thing. Are you aware of who B. Wu is? Does she get âa couple tweetsâ about [anything] she [did/does/will do] that are actual critiques, or are they just ggâer trollies doing the ânyah nyahâ bullshit sniping? In fact, letâs try it with your reply to me:
Reply 1: HAHAHA Fucking moron douchebag. Grammar is your friend, dipshit.
Reply 2: Please feel free to dig up your own research to compare/contrast the critiques received by your strawmen relative to B. Wu. Iâll wait.
See how that works?
As for this nonsense:
Yeah, women have a long history of being treated equally by men the world 'round. I can claim whatever I want, but I know not to claim it in the utter absence of facts. But do tell me more about the âred scareâ and how it compares.
8 Likes
9 Likes
Oh man the reason for banning is âbeing uncoolâ and I laughed and laughed! 
13 Likes
I understand the concern. I also think in a time when all of the pollsters and pundits can go on merrily talking about Clinton being a sure thing, and then backpedal like mad when all of their stats are off, that I have to take Trumpâs true âinfluenceâ with a grain of salt.
I could be just as wrong as the rest of course, and I donât want to see a Trump presidency.
