Continuing coronavirus happenings (Part 2)

Science is hard, evaluation of data takes time and usually does not result in headline-grabbing statements. Jumping to conclusions is easy-peasy. And the attention-grabbing headlines practically write themselves. The antivaxxers are loving this.

14 Likes

As are the web site click counters.

8 Likes

:+1: very cool!

10 Likes
17 Likes

This article claims that the USA has expressly recommended that Brazil not buy the Russian vaccine against Covid-19.

The journalist shows that this information appears in the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ 2020 annual report. A section of the document says that such a measure was recommended to ‘combat evil influences in the Americas’. Last Saturday, the Brazilian government announced the purchase of 10 million doses of the Russian vaccine.

10 Likes

Source looks okay:

https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/2020-annual-report.pdf

Combatting malign influences in the Americas: OGA used diplomatic relations in the Americas
region to mitigate efforts by states, including Cuba, Venezuela, and Russia, who are working to
increase their influence in the region to the detriment of US safety and security. OGA coordinated
with other U.S. government agencies to strengthen diplomatic ties and offer technical and
humanitarian assistance to dissuade countries in the region from accepting aid from these illintentioned states. Examples include using OGA’s Health AttachĂ© office to persuade Brazil to reject the Russian COVID-19 vaccine, and offering CDC technical assistance in lieu of Panama accepting an offer of Cuban doctors.

6 Likes

Cold War 2.0?

7 Likes

Russia is certainly in a cold war against the US. Whether the US is in a cold war with Russia is an interesting question.

7 Likes

This.

Also, this:

The German PEI, in charge of vaccination regulation, issued this statement today and speaks of a “conspicuous accumulation” of a very rare form of sinus venes thromboses in combination with throbocytopenia.

Please note the absence of the word “significant” here, and also note that they basically say that they have to wait for the EMA.

It is still a total clusterfuck of political and scientific communication.

9 Likes

Haven’t seen any news on trials for under-18s lately.

11 Likes
5 Likes

If it comes from reading my posts upthread, I apologize.

1 Like
12 Likes
6 Likes

Epidemics on top of pandemics.

19 Likes

Finally! This sounds promising


Moderna to launch COVID-19 vaccine trial on children as young as 6 months old - ABC News (go.com)

24 Likes

Things still bad in Finland.

16 Likes

Just about to post this. Pfizer and JJ also gearing up for pediatric trials, but with much more limited age ranges.

No idea on timing: as I read it there will be one trial (or more, depending on results?) where they try to nail down dosage, followed by a second placebo trial for safety/efficaciousness.

9 Likes

Yeah, timeframe is the real buggaboo. Hopefully by year’s end? That might be pushing it, though.

10 Likes

Two close friends living in Minneapolis got vaccinated over the weekend! They are both below 45 years old. It was a zip code based vaccination effort.
I’m so happy for them but also jealous. It was the J&J vaccine, so one and done. Sounded like very minimal side effects the day after.
I can’t f-ing wait. But I will. I will wait.

19 Likes