Wonder if he has enough self-reflection to realize that the party and ideology he advocates for his entire career wants him dead? Or at the very least doesn’t care if he dies? 
He’s a acceptable casualty in the war on culture.
I guess personal growth and a Saul of Tarsus-type transformation isn’t in the cards for Cavuto.
The RW always plays the victim. Some of them are actually getting the chance.
- No
- Yes
I believe his apology here is sincere:
Sincere, but still an asshole: “So sorry to disappoint you.” - Neil Cavuto on surviving Covid.
It kind of makes sense though…I don’t spend enough time thinking about fake documentation to have been worried in either case, until the anti-vax crowd made the one a genuine problem.
Not unexpected, but hard to read: 
The outcome of the Trump/Kushner plan, exactly as they thought it would be.
There should be criminal consequences for this kind of heartless mass murder.
If we get them, it will be on various money-laundering bullshit, and not on the horrific toll on human life caused by their near genocidal policies. Because, you know… both sides are bad… /s
At this point, like with Al Capone, if we can get them all behind bars on tax evasion, fine, I’ll take it. It’s not justice, but it stops the hemorrhaging.
Agreed. Until that happens, these assholes are seen as the model of “how to get it done” on the right.
Iceland has only had a total of 61 official covid deaths so far, so hopefully they know what they’re doing, but this quote from the Ministry of Health sure is ominous.
woah. big gathering. that’s like 0.05 percent of all icelanders. imagine 180,000 us citizens all in one place 
( more seriously: let’s everyone just wait six more months to make sure all is well, and even then give mandatory masking another year. it’s all too soon )
It also depends on if the borders are completely open. Tourists account for a lot of misbehavior in Iceland these days.
This is something that a lot of doctors were talking about last year, but the CDC finally came around to the same conclusion.
Edit to add- Here’s the actual CDC page on this new recommendation rather than just a news report:
Of course, that’s how medical science works.
Docs and nurses: we are noticing a trend
Scientists: let’s study it…
Scientists: ok, here’s the study protocol…recruit patients
…
…
Scientists: ok, here’s what the data says!
Docs and nurses: Great! Now we can adopt that in our paractice.
Often, the groups above overlap. And clinicians need to use their best judgement. But making a radical change to practice before the data is in is risky and can be irresponsible.
That’s absolutely true, but one of the studies I referenced above was from July of last year. And that study was itself confirming an earlier study that came out in May. The span of time between then and now was longer than the length of the phase 3 trials to get the vaccines approved in the first place. A number of other countries were using different spacing than the initial trials from almost the very beginning, so updating the spacing of vaccine shots seems like a relatively low risk (not a “radical change” as you suggest) and probably shouldn’t have taken quite this long.
