Councillor who voted to close all public toilets gets a ticket for public urination


#1

[Read the post]


#2

If this had happened in the US, he’d have the extra joy of being placed on the sex offender’s registry. 8 of 10 on the schadenfreude scale.


#3

40 vs 22 million? Pretty damn good ROI, maybe he needs to pee some more.


#4

When having a pee is outlawed, only outlaws…


#5

Just 549,999 more times and the deficit will be covered!


#6

Taking the piss…


#7

I’m still waiting for the explanation of how urination is supposedly a sex act.


#8

Urine trouble, councillor!


#9

The average bladder is 0.5-1L … If you’re pissing in public, I’m going to go with the upper end of that scale. So, 500,000 Liters is a deficit-freedom-tank of this size:


#10

I’m pretty sure this only applies in the US. It’s the possible exposure of the male sex organ, not the urination, that is considered a sex act. Mission creep at its finest.


#11

I’m sure you could find some videos if you’re really interested. :smile:


#12

You all keep walking and I’ll catch up, I’ve got to take a Jackie.


#13

Consistently doing his part to close the budget gap both as a citizen and a councillor.

It’s rare to see this kind of devotion to duty; the Scots can rightly be proud!


#14


#15

He pissed into the wind one too many times.


#16

There really does need to be a mitigation clause for pissing in “public.” It’s basically an anti-vagrancy law that penalizes being homeless.


#17

It’s all urine pee pee.


#18

Hmm… Are you sure? I was under the distinct impression that it was tinky wees…


#19

And look at that, they’re already making money back!


#20

It might seem that way, but was any actual wealth produced, to be symbolized by the “exchange” of money?