Gotta say, a penis with no nerve function doesnât sound fun at all. I suppose you can write your name in the snow with it, but for sex, a strap on sounds more practical⌠:-/
Yes!
Because Japanese paternity law is not based on DNA or paternity but marriage and recognition. A father of a unmarried womanâs child may choose not to recognize the child. DNA evidence isnât used to determine paternity in Japan it seems.
Theres legal precedence.
I mean. If someone had Elvisâs schlong, could they have Elvisâs baby in Japan?
I guess that would beg the question⌠Whoâs dong is it? Posthumously bequeathed by law to the next posessor? Is possession 9/10s in Japan?
Can a stolen dong be used to create an heir for a heirless dead billionaire? What if there was a sex tape!? The weirdest grave robbing dong transplanting baby making sex tape ever? Itâs arguably proof of paternity due to Japanâs archaic family law.
Sean Connery in⌠Rising Sun 2. Raising son. Only a elderly Scottish detective with a lisp can solve this bizarre case! He and his one armed chimpanzee Bobo take on the Yakuza, the PC crowd, and agitate the conspiracy theorists - all while proving⌠That bald guy with a ponytail look isnât the only downside of being a radically racist aikido master!
I saw a mind-blowing example of that the other day⌠There was some stupid American ârealityâ show on my gfâs telly, where someone put a mannequin in her housemateâs bed and woke her up with an air horn, and its boobs were pixellated. The camera was staring right up the dummyâs crotch, which wasnât censored.
Pretty damn odd. Itâs almost certain the boobs were just as featureless as the crotch, but some nutjob obviously found rock-hard, nipple-less boob-like objects enough of a turn-on to inspire the bowdlerisation.
Strange and disturbing.
Funny how BoingBoing uses âhackâ as a substitute for almost every verb, except not this time. What? No penis hacking?
It was already hacked.
(Iâll see myself out now)
Youâre just making it harder for everyone.
Try the Snap-On Tool Co.
Thereâs the rub.
Ah the joy of reverting to middle-school humor.
They probably had nipples. Pretty sure you canât even put a crude drawing of nipples on american broadcast TV (outside of maybe PBS). Basic cable follows basically the same rules for reasons (offending advertisers, self-censorship to discourage government regulation, general spinelessness - if you saw a movie on TBS, you havenât seen that movie).
Anyone else think urinary function should be the first priority?
I used to play with a girl when I was a little kid that had exactly this issue. She had had toes transplanted onto arms the must have ended with the carpal bones. They were definitely toes, not just stumpy little fingers. So⌠The procedure/technique existed (this was back in the late 70âs/early 80âs), but I obviously canât say if this was the case for the girl you knew. (wouldnât it be weird if it was the same kid? You didnât happen to grow up in a So. Cal. south bay beach city around that time period?
I want royalties on that!
However, [Dr. Dicken!] Ko added that while sexual function is a goal, reproduction is not, because of a concern surrounding the ethical issues of who the potential father may be.
Is this a joke? Who made this up? This wasnât a testicle transplant, as far I could read.
screw that doc, i want it to look supernatural!!!
hey I know the original article might not have used the right terminology but could you change âgender reconstructionâ to âgenital reconstruction (for ftm trans people)â? because thatâs what it is.
gender isnât physical. itâs body parts that are physical. just want to avoid that confusion. thanks.
anyway, ftm surgery with real dicks is in our future!! thatâs awesome
Shocked this hasnât been posted yet:
Its Chandler Bing.