Drums of War

[Wanderfound]

Speaking of Iraq…

Intercepted Podcast: Legacy of Blood — the 55-Year U.S. War Against Iraqis

This is an interesting bit:

JS: Facing almost no resistance, the Iraqi rebels seize key military and government installations in Baghdad and elsewhere in the country and they declare an end to the era of the Hashemite royals who ruled Iraq backed by the iron fist of Western colonial powers.

Abd al-Karim Qasim: Our revolution is a real reaction against tyranny and corruption. We want to use our wealth to raise the standard of living of the people.

JS: Abd al-Karim Qasim declares Iraq a republic, and he consolidates power through a revolutionary council. Qasim and his allies created a structure for the Iraqi presidency where power will be shared by representatives of the three largest groups in Iraq: the Shia, the Sunni, and the Kurds. Qasim becomes prime minister and the new government begins to implement sweeping economic and political reforms.

This new government seized nearly all of the land in Iraq that was controlled by the British-owned Iraq Petroleum Company and redistributed that land to Iraqi farmers, and Qasim pulled out of the U.S.- and British-run Baghdad Pact, which was aimed at keeping the Soviets away from Middle Eastern oil.

Newscaster: At Lancaster House in London, representatives of five nations meet to discuss a crisis. Mr. Macmillan, who presided, opened the meeting with a tribute to King Faisal.

British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan: We meet today under the shadow of the recent, tragic events in Iraq.

JS: While the British and Americans began plotting to isolate and possibly remove Qasim, the new revolutionary government in Baghdad gained rapid, widespread support in the country. Laws on women’s rights were passed and amnesty was granted to Kurds who had engaged in uprisings in Iraq in the 1940s. Qasim also ended a ban on the Iraqi Communist Party. He pulled Iraq out of the security and military partnerships with the United States and other Western countries, and he normalized relations with the Soviet Union.

Qasim openly backed Palestinian liberation causes and the Algerian resistance against the French. He also stated clearly that oil-rich Kuwait was part of Iraq and that its independence was a project of Western oil corporations. Qasim nationalized many of Britain’s oil fields and formed a new Iraqi national oil company.

Newscaster: The story in the capital city of Baghdad is the scene of the latest bloody coup d’état, a demonstration of violent, 20th-century Arab tensions, set against a way of life that has changed little since the Dark Ages.

JS: The United States and Britain wanted Qasim gone, and the CIA, under John F. Kennedy, began working with Iraqi factions that the U.S. believed could help overthrow Qasim — namely the Ba’ath Party, and one of its most vicious henchmen, a man who had actually tried to assassinate Qasim in 1959. His name? Saddam Hussein.

And that assassination attempt failed. But a few years later, on February 9, 1963, Abd al-Karim Qasim was overthrown and he was executed after a bizarre show trial on Iraqi radio.

Newscaster: In the storied city of Baghdad, capital of Iraq, has been the scene once more of bloody revolt, that has ceded a new government. For five years, General Abd al-Karim Qasim, right, ruled the country by armed might, after he seized power by assassinating King Faisal and the prime minister. Now, like many before him, he has fallen as he rose: Violently. A pro-communist, Qasim died before a firing squad in the wreckage of the Defense Ministry building.

JS: As Saddam Hussein and the Ba’ath Party consolidated power, they massacred thousands of people, including a huge number of communists.

Newscaster: Army and militiamen carry on the search for communist infiltrators, over 100,000 of whom entered Baghdad during Qasim’s regime. When they are found, the communists from other countries are deported. Native reds, known for crimes perpetrated on behalf of Qasim, are sent before firing squads, as the Arabs show they are more concerned about the dangers of communism that is realized by some Western leaders.

JS: The interior minister of the new regime would later say that the Ba’ath Party came to power on a CIA train. Yes, a decade after overthrowing the democratically elected leader, Mossadegh, in Iran, the CIA played a similar role in toppling the Iraqi government, which like Mossadegh was unfriendly to colonial Western oil corporations.

The CIA provided lists of people for Saddam and his men to exterminate. Those lists were compiled at CIA stations across the Middle East. Suspected communists, leftists or supporters of Qasim, were tortured and summarily executed.

Newscaster: The streets of ancient Baghdad become the scene of a short but decisive revolution that topples the pro-communist government, of Premier Abd al-Karim Qasim, shown here on the right. A six-man military junta seizes power on a holy day, and within hours, the premier, who reportedly had executed 10,000 people, is himself shot.

JS: The U.S. and other Western powers characterize the overthrow of Qasim as a victory against Soviet incursions into the Middle East, and Washington responded enthusiastically to Qasim’s downfall. The characterization that it was a massive blow to the Soviet Union became the dominant narrative, and the United States started to resume military aid to the new Ba’athist regime.

[“Ba’ath Party Anthem” plays.]

By the time Saddam Hussein officially took over as the president of Iraq in 1979, the country was considered by the U.S. to be one of its most strategically important regimes in the Middle East, particularly after the U.S. backed-shah was overthrown in neighboring Iran.

[Wanderfound]

Jon Schwarz (schwarz)

Gangsters in control of the world’s largest military.

[Wanderfound]

[Wanderfound]

The war that will soon be old enough to enlist.

maoist (thelateempire)

[Wanderfound]

Consensus politics:

Nina Illingworth (EIWBM_Cat)

Eighty-one million people.

[Wanderfound]

From:

[Letter from Washington] | Mobbed Up, by Andrew Cockburn | Harper's Magazine

[Wanderfound]

Priorities:

Adam H. Johnson (adamjohnsonNYC)

[Wanderfound]

MLK on war:

[anon73430903]

Edinburgh Antifascist Action: Statement On Banner Drop In Solidarity With Afrin

[anon48584343]

Israel blamed for Syria airfield attack

Who did it? Hmmmmmm

Guess whose first day on the job it is Monday? Mr J. Bolton.

[anon89609066]

@anon48584343

Guess whose first day on the job it is Monday? Mr J. Bolton.

Get ready… we’re going into Syria now.

[Wanderfound]

Here we go again…

Brian Stelter (brianstelter)

[Wanderfound]

Cassus belli:

Department of State

A relevant reminder of last year:

Leaked memo schooled Tillerson on human rights

Hook’s memo “tells Tillerson that we should do exactly what Russian and Chinese propaganda says we do—use human rights as a weapon to beat up our adversaries while letting ourselves and our allies off the hook,” said Tom Malinowski, who served as an assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor in the administration of former President Barack Obama.

The memo:

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000160-6c37-da3c-a371-ec3f13380001

Key quote:

One useful guideline for a realistic and successful foreign policy is that allies should be treated differently – and better – than adversaries. Otherwise, we end up with more adversaries, and fewer allies. The classic dilemma of balancing ideals and interests is with regard to America’s allies​. In relation to our competitors, there is far less of a dilemma. We do not look to bolster America’s adversaries overseas; we look to pressure, compete with, and outmaneuver them. For this reason, we should consider human rights as an important issue in regard to US relations with China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran. And this is not only because of moral concern for practices inside those countries. It is also because pressing those regimes on human rights is one way to impose costs, apply counter-pressure, and regain the initiative from them strategically.

Therefore:

https://twitter.com/eiwbm_cat/status/983516336939782144

[anon61221983]

They know he’s watching and this is part of his decision making patterns… Sheesh.

[Wanderfound]

Charles Lister (Charles_Lister)

Apparently we’re now blaming the Germans for the Syrian gas attack?

[Wanderfound]

One possible response to the obvious hypocrisy re: Yemen and Syria is to claim that chemical weapons are a special kind of evil, justifying an extreme response.

So, a reminder:

Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

Or for something more recent:

Reuters U.S. News (ReutersUS)

It’s also worth noting that the US routinely uses cluster bombs, which are banned by assorted international conventions. It also routinely uses white phosphorus as an anti-personnel weapon.

[anon61221983]

[Wanderfound]

This week’s Intercepted podcast is very good, particularly the interviews with Wallace Shawn and Arundhati Roy.

Intercepted Podcast: A Nation Addicted to War

[anon15383236]

Ha, agreed. It came to mind just now when I read your post above about hypocritical U.S. claims about the evil of chemical weapons when used by others.

(Fun fact: did you know Scahill got his start on Democracy Now?)

[Wanderfound]

I loved the Arundhati Roy segment.

That was the first time I’ve ever heard unapologetic anti-imperialism given airtime on a major US media outlet.