Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/06/15/ewoks-without-fur-are-absolute.html
…
They eat people. Ewoks are terrifying.
I’m embarrassed by how long it took me to realize that “Ewok” is just a play on “Wookie.” Damn you George Lucas!
Oh fuck. I was THIS years old
I think what’s more disconcerting is that Warwick Davis never seems to age.
Yeah. They really put the wok into Ewok.
Maybe we are just Ewoks without fur…
All this time I thought it was a play on the name of the Miwok, the indigenous people who inhabited the region of California where Lucas’ Skywalker Ranch is now located.
Any and all Star Wars flicks have become horrifying after watching The Phantom Menace. I hate the lot of them now.
I wasn’t aware of this factoid, and it seems quite plausible. I don’t claim to know the facts here; my “revelation” about the species name came about randomly when I was thinking about Star Wars a few days ago.
Both sound like totally plausible explanations to me.
Agreed. I can’t even watch the originals without sneering at how awful some of the dialogue is. What once seemed quaint and a little dated was just revealed to be Lucas’s incredibly poor writing and incomprehension of people. Plus, because everyone realized the yet-unwritten story evolved from Star Wars (originally wasn’t even called ep IV) to ESB, it was easy to overlook a lot of the weirdness around Luke/Leia. Afterward, it just felt creepy.
Fuzzie-Wuzzie was a bear. Fuzzie-Wuzzie had no hair. Fuzzie-Wuzzie wasn’t very fuzzy, was he?
I don’t know what’s weird about it: it’s a common trope in the mythologies he was drawing on, but he didn’t actually have them get it on, as they would have in a proper myth…
I was going to post this until I learned today it’s a racist poem originating from British wars in Sudan, referring to black African hair.
I did not know that.
Huh, the background looks complicated. Rudyard Kipling’s 1892 poem “Fuzzy-Wuzzy” refers to the British wars in Sudan but makes no mention of a bear. The children’s rhyme “Fuzzy-Wuzzy was a Bear” came from a 1944 children’s novelty song and doesn’t appear to connect to the Kipling poem in any way beyond the title phrase.