The article states that the victim may be mentally impaired, which explains his poor decision making. More importantly, the prosecution declined to press charges against the shooter, even though the victim was shot through the chest! That is the real takeaway from this story.
Maybe he was trying to take a picture of his attacker but accidentally used the front facing camera? And ended up with selfie of the year.
We are talking about Florida Man, the Worldâs Worst Super Hero.
3 Likes
If only he used FrontBack.
1 Like
so confused here, is this the selfie?
&Iâm not sure who to root for?
Is she the evil seductress luring him over with intent to kill
or is he the ex-lover over possessive stalker
1 Like
this is what i was thinking, too. âwhoops, front-facing camera turned onâŚâ
Why would being shot in the chest be important on whether someone is charged with something or not? Other than being shot in the back, I canât think of shot placement being relevant.
From the article, sounds like the guy didnât take ânoâ for an answer. âA week before the shooting, she sought an injunction for protection against Noll.â
1 Like
Why would he do that? Heâs in HER house. We know who the victim - er - attacker is.
Can you imagine the world of right-wing internet trolling if America were castrated of the WTF state? Itâd be insufferable.
âI is ded. LOLâ
1 Like
Why does it matter where he was shot? He survived so it wasnât murder. Beyond that there is no legal or moral significance to the location of the wound, as long as it wasnât in the back or something like that. It would be pretty fucked up to charge or sentence people based on marksmanship.
I could see happening that in some states.
" Weeeeelll, we was gonna sentence you to fifteen years, but thatâs some real purty shootinâ, so we just gonna give you ten."
Marks for artistic interpretation?
1 Like
Either thatâs a serious low-rider, or that womanâs bike has some comically tall handlebars.
1 Like
If a person survives someones attempt to kill them it is called Attempted Murder or at the minimum Manslaughter. My point in describing the gun shot to the chest is that she obviously was aiming to kill. The article does not say he broke in, only that he tripped the alarm because she had changed the code. She knew he was unbalanced, and used the easily misinterpreted text she sent, and the alarm as pretext to try to kill him under the stand your ground law. She is a smart lady.
1 Like
Do keep in mind that somebody whoâs been shot and is in the process of passing out from shock is not likely to be particularly clearheaded.
Screwed up priorities but its a once in a lifetime (hopefully) event.
This makes the photo I took of my hand after I got stitches a few weeks ago seem like the work of a piker.
Certainly fits with the âtireless narcissistâ leanings of his coulda-been-final actâŚ
