If only we could invent a process and expertise by which the quality of these changes could be somehowâŠI dunnoâŠassured?..before rolling them into production
Someday, God willing
Just noticed a better one in the search results. The one I originally posted was the one I was looking for, this one is more appropriate, IMHO.
Even using the Test environment doesnât always help.
Force feeding users his tweets is Elonâs kink?
Also, while you can make a list private, I know an account would receive a notification when it was added to a public one. Anyway, itâs not a great sign that Elon has any interest in the last bastion from advertising on that site.
Especially if he asks somebody about it.
In a filing made to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the billionaire revealed the donations, most of which were clustered toward the end of the year, which suggests that tax planning may have played a role. At Tuesdayâs closing price for Tesla TSLA, 1.02%, the donations were worth $2.42 billion.
Musk didnât disclose the recipient.
However, last yearâs Tesla stock donations worth $5.7 billion were found by Bloomberg to have entirely been sent to his personal foundation.
Teslaâs response really shouldnât be called a recall.
From the NHTSAâs Safety Recall Report
Description of Remedy Program:
Tesla will deploy an over-the-air (âOTAâ) software update at no cost to the
customer. The OTA update, which we expect to deploy in the coming
weeks, will improve how FSD Beta negotiates certain driving maneuvers
during the conditions described above.Tesla does not plan to include a statement in the Part 577 owner
notification about pre-notice reimbursement because there are no out of
warranty repairs related to these conditions.
So, theyâre not taking back vehicles and it doesnât look like theyâre removing the software. Theyâre going to claim they have fixed the problem by changing the software and keep going.
Blech. I was hoping it was disabling of the software, which is what it really should be.
My gut feel on this isnât that this isnât a âperkâ of blue, but just a cost saving measure limiting the number of texts they send and theyâre trying to spin it.
IMHO, nobody should be able to use SMS-based two-factor, itâs riddled enough with issues as it is. They already support authenticators, so just limit it to that.
âSlightly worseâ
Well thatâs got be be reassuring to the US government.
