This exchange between @HillaryClinton and @elonmusk should kill any remaining confidence advertisers had in the platform.
Along with any lingering doubt that Musk is a dangerous far-right fuckhead.
18 Likes
21 Likes
So if Musk has a few drinks or tokes at home - itâs okay if someone cracks his skull open with a hammer?
Good to know.
12 Likes
A total collapse of this business while focusing on bullshit like twitter. Mucks gonna save the planet!
13 Likes
Musk finally picked the wrong people to fuck with
15 Likes
Nancy shouldnât forget this when pedo guy lobbies Congress for some special goodies.
Bring that gavel down hard!
15 Likes
I hope itâs true that he took it down because someone he shouldnât have fucked with pushed or forced him to. But, unless I missed it, I didnât see an indication in that piece of who that might be.
8 Likes
This will sure help Twitter /s
15 Likes
âI have miscalculated the value of my Twitter activity and realize that it is nothing worth supporting by itself for the vast majority of people. It is not me who is popular, but it is that work that is useful. It is not valuable by itself, but a comfortable timesaver, and I get that now.â
But Nibel also cited the Musk takeover as contributing to his departure, and heâs voiced open skepticism about Muskâs ability to lead Twitter in the past:
âThen there is the elephant in the room which is the platform itself. I donât think that Twitter has yet experienced good leadership, and this trend will not change with Musk either. I do not trust the platform. I do not trust Musk and his seemingly infinite immaturity. I do not think Twitter will fall apart instantly but that it could die a slow death. Why waste more time?â
8 Likes
13 Likes
The author of that article
17 Likes
Mucks said that there were millions of paid bots on twitters- he just didnât mention that he was paying for them.
10 Likes
The only board member. I canât believe the other investors and banks are comfortable with that and donât want information and some oversight.
16 Likes
How Is That Even Legalâ˘
11 Likes
9 Likes
Because legally, under the agreement and loans and everything else, itâs his company and likely only his. I donât think weâve ever had this large a company structure owned by a single person with no clear continuity, so itâs all new ground, but itâs legal for the same reason that a kidâs lemonade stand doesnât need a board of directors. Itâs wholly owned.
1 Like
Excelling at being an asshole. As usual.
5 Likes
5 Likes
