8 Likes
âWalz is obviously unsuitable because objective reasons. Which Iâve just made up.â
5 Likes
6 Likes
I hope itâs not a goal. Why should it be a goal?
7 Likes
Do not all politicians seek to appease the New York Times above all!?!
7 Likes
5 Likes
Hey, at least ChatGPT has a lower chance of being as consistently wrong as some of the existing NYT opinion writers?
9 Likes
3 Likes
depends on what itâs trained on. theyâll probably use the pitchbot as source material
5 Likes
Remarkable that âout-of-touch liberalismâ and âsub-millionaire-class-championing progressivismâ seem to be synonyms in the average industry tycoonâs vanity media outlet and antonyms everywhere else in the US.
9 Likes
thatâs just par for the course. they wouldnât want to engage with what progressive policies actually stand for, people might like what they hear. better (for them) to paint anything leftish with the brush of failed liberalism.
( and, if there is something that both the left and the right agree on: itâs that american style liberalism doesnât work very well. although of course, the left and the right disagree about why ⌠but, again, it wouldnât serve corporate media interests to engage with that either. )
3 Likes
In no small part because the right has been dumping toxic sludge into it to confuse and redefine what liberalism means.
7 Likes
6 Likes
5 Likes
15 Likes
Yeah, I read that this morning, such a load of deflecting, unsubstantiated, gossiping shite. Dowdâs âcleverâ shtick hasnât aged well either. Itâs worth a look, if just for the rueful laughs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/17/opinion/election-dnc-convention.html
Nary a mention, of course, of whatâs likely the main part played by the corporate press, including the 200+ pieces run by The Times about how âSleepy Joe has got go.â 
6 Likes
