It ASTONISHES me how many people misuse the Ad Hominem fallacy. You clearly have no idea what it actually means.
This was actually meant for @IudexFatarum apologies.
It ASTONISHES me how many people misuse the Ad Hominem fallacy. You clearly have no idea what it actually means.
This was actually meant for @IudexFatarum apologies.
Iâm actually tired of people bringing this up. Oh no, young women were acting as some young women do and were having fun and dancing! OH NO!
Funny, Iâm not the one who said anything about ad hominemâŚwhich, btw I do think you should review the definition of. I do not think it means what you think it meansâŚ
Oops sorry, I scrolled up to far; the person in question responded to you. Edited. But, no, that person did not have the definition correct. Sorry.
Iâm so confused right now!
Judge not lest ye be judged.
Perhaps itâs a little unfair to criticize the girls, but this did occur at a public function. They were paraded on national TV in support of their father, so⌠in my opinion theyâre fair game.
But what is even more disturbing is that their parents let them dress in that manner. Sorry, Iâm an old guy and in my time, they just wouldnât have been put on public display dressed like that. --there was a dress code, such as a tie and suit to church. My grandfather was horrified that my shoes werenât freshly shined and did it himself so as not to be an embarrassment.
Iâm 58 and canât wait for the end so as to escape to this messed up planet.
It was just as shitty when this was brought up about the Bush twins.
Yeah, not me.
Obviously.
They are fair game? For being the presidentâs daughters?! They didnât choose this life. What a horrifying statement. Where does the line start and begin in this game, anyway? Who draws that line? You?
And they were âparadedâ? How? Is it because they are young women and dared to show themselves on national TV? So now theyâve âparadedâ around, as if they are nothing but objects rather than real, actual human teenage girls? Your entire comment is disturbing, quite frankly.
They are teenagers! âLet them dress in that mannerâ. I am so confused. Are we looking at the same pictures??
Dress in WHAT manner? Are you sure youâre talking about the Obama kids?? I am so confused. They were wearing CARDIGANS!
Also, it wasnât church. It was a freakinâ turkey pardoning, but even if it were church, they would be dressed perfectly acceptable.
You say you canât wait to escape this messed up planet, and yet youâre still stuck in, what, 1952, and talking about how in the good olâ days your grandfather was horrified at shoes that werenât perfectly shined? And complaining about two young women who are dressed in a perfectly acceptable fashion for a turkey pardoning? OH, bother. This isnât the good olâ days, anymore. Hate to break it to ya.
I wonder how often you wear a tie. I just wonder. Or if you just leave your judgement to the youngins. EYE ROLL
You guys seriously need to stop replying to trolls.
Have you considered therapy?
This 'aint your Daddyâs first family.
Fuck you, Grandpa!!!
A real apology has a part you left out, which is â0. Actually meaning what you say, rather than saying it because youâre supposed to.â Without that, the other parts donât add up to much.
It was a skirt length thing?
I assume since it was from a GOP mouthpiece, it was because the girls werenât wearing a full burqa as expected by their Kenyan Muslim fatherâŚ
Whoever used âAd Hominemâ up above is a dork so their argument doesnât count anyway.
You need to not tell others what to do. PLENTY of people have the same view ⌠including the very person who is the subject of this post. So I donât know why you think this is a trollâs opinion only. Or that itâs for sure a troll, and not just some asshole who actually believes what they are spewing. Itâs not exactly unheard of. As this post demonstratesâŚ
http://www.illdoctrine.com/2012/06/why_you_should_feed_the_trolls.html
The account name is âafriendlyguy1â with a name of âJohn Friendâ and his post ends with âIâm 58 and canât wait for the end so as to escape to this messed up planet.â Is this credible?
Although looking at the account, heâs been around since July 2013 and has posted other stuff (some of it rather wacky), so â maybe youâre right. I assumed it was a new user.
Wow! You mean you arenât always right? Who knew! Maybe next time resist âsplaininâ to others how they should respond to sexism, okay? Thanks! (People ask hey, what can we do to help combat sexism? And we respond, speak out! Make it known that that shit is not okay! And then people get lectured for speaking out, and told to ignore the sexism. We canât win for losing.)
And I donât even give a shit if itâs a troll or not. Please read the video I posted. Itâs important.