The “but actually” people who want to argue the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia (usually self-proclaimed libertarians and anarcho-capitalists in my experience) don’t seem to understand how language is used casually. Pedophilia is commonly considered sexual attraction or abuse of children and our society technically considers anyone under 18 to be “children.” I stopped talking to them a while ago since they seem to inevitably pull out the “but what if the child consents?!?” question.
5 Likes
Good call. I mean, of all the causes to go to bat for why choose “defending adults who have sex with children?”
5 Likes
And he’ll still get re-elected.
2 Likes
5 Likes
I’m sure they at least shared a cup of pee.
7 Likes
I find all the child abuse stuff horrifying.
I also would not be surprised if Trump and ‘Randy Andy’ are both up to their eyeballs in Mossack Fonseca style egregious money laundering etc. Neither Royal Families nor the spawn of wealthy persons (like DJT) are known for their ethical financial behaviour.
1 Like
This…
1 Like
7 Likes
Nah. You don’t believe that either.
7 Likes
Because for Trump, “biblical sense” is code for “Cohen has to pay her off.”
3 Likes
I wasn’t prepared for that mental image.
2 Likes
Sexy porn actress for sure.
You know, the only way to get into the US without a visa.
4 Likes
Is it just me, or is this comment not at all relevant to the topic under discussion?
13 Likes
What comment?
9 Likes
Of course not, because Andrew isn’t a gentleman.
1 Like
Since Our Glorious Leader Donald Trump (hallowed be thy name) has, by his own statements, the BEST MEMORY EVER then obviously these pictures are forgeries. I’m even skeptical that this “Prince Andrew” even exists. I’ve never met him.
1 Like
hehehehehe
3 Likes
Quoted as saying; “What Fire? They keep saying there is this fire, I don’t see any fire, they’re making it up. Sad.”
2 Likes
