They probably monitor the site, like they monitor everything. But I don’t know if they would contact BB unless there was inside information, or direct leaks coming from here.
If you want the big reveal all at once, taking him out makes sense. America will get the blame and all the secrets get dumped. He switched one target on his back for another with the security file thing.
I think it’s excellent that the info has been coming out as a trickle instead of the Wikileaks dump. It keeps the pressure on, and the government can’t make one comment, and move on.
I can’t speak for other countries, but the people in the US have a short attention span. They can’t forget about it if more keeps on coming.
Mmm. It seems implausible, but there are a lot of ways of feeling peoples’ privates without putting your hand in their pants. My kind of reference is the seemingly arcane, but featherlight intrusiveness of the British civil service. They just … have a way.
Not, that in any regard, I think BB would have paid any attention. Just sometimes you don’t get the substance of an article to write, you might just have tastes and whiffs.
An example might be say leaning on the brokers who service the portfolios of the investors behind BB, were there any such people, and making them nervous about being closely associated with an “anti-American” media outlet. They might then express restrained concern to the investors, and if there were 10 of them, 1 might get twitchy.
"At a London court hearing this week for Miranda’s lawsuit, a document called a “Ports Circulation Sheet” was read into the record. It was prepared by Scotland Yard - in consultation with the MI5 counterintelligence agency - and circulated to British border posts before Miranda’s arrival. The precise date of the document is unclear.
“Intelligence indicates that Miranda is likely to be involved in espionage activity which has the potential to act against the interests of UK national security,” according to the document.
“We assess that Miranda is knowingly carrying material the release of which would endanger people’s lives,” the document continued. “Additionally the disclosure, or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause. This therefore falls within the definition of terrorism…”
So, Miranda wasn’t found to be carrying anything which “would endanger people’s lives”. This leads to the conclusion that any such material does exist, but Miranda didn’t have it on him. But…if the threat level was so incredibly high, why didn’t they just take Miranda out? Smells…bs-ey, doesn’t it?
Interesting definition of ‘terrorism’, too. Since that definition could be applied to virtually any political or idealogical movement in existence, I’m pretty sure 'm a terrorist, too. Funny how, if I know stuff they don’t want anybody to know, I’m a terrorist - but if they know stuff they don’t want anybody to know, they’re ‘good government’.
Biggest potential point of failure right now is this USA Freedom Act. It does essentially nothing, other than provide for more oversight of a thing which was illegal and ought not be done at all. If they sell that to the general public? Then, we’re stuck. But I will say no more, as even BB must have some upper limit on swearing. The fuck stops here.