It’s conceivable, but given the context I rate it no more than a 20% chance.
By the same token, maybe it’s a real Bruce Wayne.
It’s conceivable, but given the context I rate it no more than a 20% chance.
By the same token, maybe it’s a real Bruce Wayne.
Peter Parker is Spider-Man. ‘Spiderman’ just sounds like someone’s surname.
I just checked the post again, and the name is Amanda Wilcox, not Amanda Knox.
Darn, I would’ve sworn I saw Amanda Knox in there this morning
It was described as a dismal science by Carlyle. But nobody ever said it had to be a dismal science. Trouble is … well, economists these days really are dismal, relying on assumptions about the rational actor and so on.
I assumed you did know about “dismal science” and were choosing your words very carefully (pedantically?). That’ll teach me!
I wish! But no, it turns out there’s still plenty of things for me to learn out there.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.