What’s that you say? The View is a shit-show? Who could possibly have known, except, I guess, anyone who has watched The View.
I’m going to guess Kamala’s willingness to appear on “America’s most erudite current affairs panel” in the first place is what got her the Beschizza treatment.
Seriously, could you please stop posting photos with eyes replaced by mouths?
Complaining only encourages Rob…
I’m asking politely. What’s the other option?
It’s just one of those non-negotiable things, like not being able to freely write the word ■■■■■ (without resorting to technical shenanigans)
Well, you need to click on:
In order to see the embedded images as well as the post itself.
If you want to avoid ever having to see anything other than pure text, here’s a completely graphics-free version of the BBS:
Also, every post has a ‘mute’ button; I use mine rather frequently.
It’s not really that technical; there’s a way to circumvent everything.
The problem is not that the post was not interesting. The problem is that the mouths4eyes photos are disturbing and not contributing towards to story.
I also do not wish to block EVERY photo on the site. Let’s be realistic.
Sure, I know I might be talking to a brick wall. But if no one ever mentions it bothers them, then it will never be changed. I figure my odds are slightly better than winning the lottery.
But many have; you are not the first to complain, and you likely won’t be the last.
How am I supposed to know that, though?
I don’t read minds; (if I did I’d be rich, and out there, trying to save the world.)
You asked for solutions, and in good faith I offered some.
My mistake; won’t happen again.
Have a good day.
No, scratch that:
Technically, because she was an authoritarian and cop-friendly prosecutor.
Honestly, I do ONE corinthian eyes shoop in how long? Pffft.
I was thinking that too, but didn’t want to start a whole big thing.
It really has come down in frequency; and you know, the toothy eyes are much more flattering than gaping-mouth eyes.
I disagree. Please keep doing it. I think it leads to interesting (grotesque) portraits.
OTOH I don’t really get the headline and the tone of this ‘article’. The whole article breathes annoyance with Harris for some reason. Down to the ‘The tests were,of course, false positives’ . I don’t see what that ‘of course’ is doing there except bemoaning the fussyness of harris or something.
She had every right to be mad. I’d be livid if they were that lax with me.
I didn’t know it had a name!
OHHH from Sandman. I never read Sandman.